A rebuttal is a sort of countering something. For an author to cause his reply to become more grounded, he should point a rundown of defects on the given contention to balance it.
<h3>How can the writer revise the rebuttal to make it stronger? </h3>
Correct answer is option A.
- By rephrasing it as a conclusion.
- This will make it harder for the person who gave the assertion difficult to safeguard the case the individual in question is attempting to shield.
- The counterclaim has one significant component that the rejoinder doesn't, which is a solid and obvious source that upholds their position. In this way, the compose can make their reply more grounded by adding a measurement or citation.
Therefore, correct answer is option A.
For more information about rebuttal, refer the following link:
brainly.com/question/3959097
Answer:
we need too know the poem hun <3
Explanation:
Answer:
sponge because it's has holes and sucks up the water
Explanation:
Answer: b.
Explanation: most of the time when it is non-fiction the author is trying to entertain and inform you at the same time.
The answer to this question is C - the common error in this sentence is a
dangling modifier. The dangling modifier included here, would be the
words 'having risen'. It Is unclear in this sentence whether this phrase
is referring to the hikers, or the river. The hikers could have been
woken up early because of the rains, until we reach the end of the
sentence that concerns a river that also could have risen due to the
rains.
