When people are led to think about their own death they are more attracted to a charismatic leader.
The German sociologist Max Weber invented the idea of charismatic authority. It involves a kind of organisation or leadership where the leader's charisma confers authority. This contrasts with two other sorts of authority, namely traditional authority and legal authority. The three categories of authority that Max Weber identified are comprised of each of the three sorts.
The first time the word "charisma" came into use was in Saint Paul's writings to the fledgling Christian communities in the first century.
Learn more about Charismatic here
brainly.com/question/28099781
#SPJ4
Answer:
ABC net income for the year is $42,500
Explanation:
Beginning total assets = $400,000
Ending total assets = $450,000
Average total assets = Beginning total assets + Ending total assets ÷ 2
= ($400,000 + $450,000) ÷ 2
= $425,000
Return on assets = 10%
Therefore,
Net income ÷ Average total assets = Return on assets
Net income = Return on assets × Average total assets
Net income = 0.1 × Average total assets
= $425,000 × 0.1
= $42,500
In order to <u>gain market share</u><u>,</u> some a firm whose product that has a large economic value do decides to charge the same price as competitors.
<h3>What is a
market share?</h3>
A market share refers to an industry percentage that is earned by a particular company over a specified time
In conclusion, some firm whose product that has a large economic value charges the same price as competitors In order to gain market share.
Read more about market share
<em>brainly.com/question/25309906</em>
Answer: Family.
Explanation:
The family a consumer is born into, strongly influences the way that consumer would make purchase for the rest of their lives. This occurs because in the family, the consumer is groomed to love a certain type of food, fashion and develop a specific type of taste that remains with them as long as they live.
Answer: True
Explanation: Under the single recovery principle if the plaintiff, that is, the person bringing up the case to the court, proves that he or she is eligible for any recovery for a particular harm then that recovery should be made and settled in once and for all by getting a lump sum amount from the payer.
Under this rule the plaintiff can not claim reward for same injury from two different entities.
