Answer:
<em>Abraham Lincoln, John Breckenridge, John Bell, And Stephen Douglas</em>
Explanation:
<em>Abraham Lincoln → National Union Party → Lincoln was morally opposed to slavery </em>
<em>John Breckenridge → Democratic Party → Had publicly declared his opposition to "impairing in any form" the legal protection of slavery.</em>
<em>John Bell → Democratic Party → Bell opposed efforts to expand slavery to the U.S. territories.</em>
<em>Stephen Douglas → Democratic Party → Douglas believed that popular sovereignty would defuse the tension between the proslavery and antislavery factions.</em>
<em />
<em />
<em>I hope this helps!</em>
<em />
<em />
The answer is B. Without the United States, the League lacked the firepower to actually make a huge difference without the individual nations suffering huge consequences. In turn, the League didn't do anything, thus they were ineffective and nothing but a figurehead for democracy and international peace.
<span>When
it was over, the Viet Cong basically ceased to be an effective force
any longer. Their ranks were decimated. All of the territory lost during
the offensive was shortly won back. But the ability of the Communists
to launch such a widespread coordinated offensive convinced the American
media and ultimately the American public that the war was now a lost
cause and demanded a withdrawal. So, tactically, it was a military
success for the U.S. but it served as a public relations success for
North Vietnam.
I believe the answer may be </span>
<span>U.S. forces dealt the Vietcong a massive military loss and regained control of all areas that the Vietcong had attacked.</span>
Nephele was a cloud nymph in Greek mythology. Also known as Aries
