The sugar plantation owner’s motivation in overthrowing
Queen Liliuokalani was because of the issue that they are likely suffering
because instead of just land ownership, U.S expansion, annexation and tariffs
issues that have arisen, there are also issue in regards of sugar profits in
which they are not happy about because this led them to suffer.
One of the main differences of interpretation between Charles Beard and Carol Berkin is their point of view on the Constitution and the founding fathers.
Charles Beard is the author of An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. In this work published in 1913, the author argued that the Constitution of the United States was formulated to serve the interests of wealthy members of the upper class of society.
One of his most controversial statements is his claim about the Founding Fathers, whom he points out as belonging to the upper-class group and who wrote the Constitution to defend their rights and interests.
On the other hand, Carol Berkin is the author of the book The Bill of Rights: The Fight to Secure America's Liberties, published in 2015. In this book, she exposes her interpretation of the process of creation of the Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of Rights.
Her interpretation of these historical events is framed in a vision of the founding fathers as mere mortals who ignored the possibility that the new government they were building would last for many years.
Based on the above, it can be inferred that Carol Berkin and Charles Beard have different views of the Constitution and the founding fathers such as:
- Charles considers that they wrote the constitution for their convenience.
- Carol describes them as ordinary people who wanted to change their situation and establish a government for all.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/1992478
<span>As
in any developing country, labor and employing companies always had
their differences. The Knights of Labor group was the first well
recognized labor union and it was all inclusive, meaning almost anybody
(women, blacks and but not Chinese) was welcomed. I think the Chinese
were admitted at a later date. After the American Federation of Labor
(AFL) was formed, the Knights of Labor fell out of favor and
disappeared.
The major difference was the Knights of Labor formed the foundation upon
which the AFL was born. Their demise was a natural evolution of the
labor movement in this country. The Knights of Labor lacked good
management and their inability to carry out successful strikes for their
members caused their ranks to be recruited by the AFL. </span>
