There is a widespread opinion on both sides of the Atlantic that as the Magna Carta is to the British attachment to rights, the American version of this attachment is to be found in the U.S. Bill of Rights. Sometimes we hear more: that not only the origin, but also the substance of the U.S. version, is to be found in the Magna Carta.
To be sure, we have to start the rights narrative somewhere and since participants in the rights debate over 400 years don’t seem inclined to go further back than the Magna Carta, it seems reasonable to start there. And despite the feudal language and medieval concerns that run through, and thus date, the document, there is something enduring there that appeals to subsequent generations.
We suggest that the enduring quality is an appeal through the centuries that those who govern us do so in a reasonable manner. And all the better to secure the proposition that rulers exercise their power in a reasonable manner, we write down what we think is unreasonable conduct. Thus a list of what those in authority can’t do emerges.
In particular, we might say that the Magna Carta calls for the rule of law in opposition to the rule of unreasonable men. Furthermore, the rule of law is to be secured by an attachment to the due process of law.
The question then is how much of the Magna Carta made its way into the U. S. Bill of Rights? The answer is 9 of the 26 provisions in the Bill of Rights can be traced back to the Magna Carta. That’s about a third or 33%. And these provisions are heavily concerned with the right to petition and the due process of law.
The Magna Carta does not call for an abolition of the monarchy or a change in the feudal order. Nor does it call for religious freedom or freedom of the press. The U.S. Bill of Rights, however, presupposes the abolition of monarchy and feudalism; the American appeal to natural rights raises the question of religious freedom and freedom of the press.
Answer:
c) variability, reactivity, and complexity.
Explanation:
According to the textbook, the three things that make people especially difficult to study are <em>variability, reactivity, and complexity</em>. Moreover, people are very difficult to study because there are ethical issues when observing and measuring other human beings. Variability makes people difficult to measure because there are many differences between people, and also people are complex beings. Reactivity makes people act differently when they know they are being observed.
Answer:
Large budget deficits may reduce private investment, thereby stifling economic growth.
Explanation:
Crowding out is a term that describes the situation that occurs when the increase in involvement of the government in a particular sector of the market economy, has a direct effect on the remaining market, either on the demand or supply side of the market.
Therefore, crowding out effects which can be caused as a result of government financing large budget deficit, thereby, making them to be involved on a particular sector of the economy, will result to government needing more capital, hence encouraging savings, through increased in interest rate, or selling of bonds and treasury bills with attractive returns, which will leads to reduction in private investment spending, such that it affects negatively the increase in inital total investment.
Athens- boys went to school starting age six and girls didn't go to school hang on a minute I'm about to answer spartans
Answer:
Non argument.
Explanation:
It is a explanation. It doesn't contain any conclusion, any statement, so it is not an argument. It leads you to think that black women are more opressed, but it doesn't say explicitly.
