The President plans to raise military spending to $343 billion a year in fiscal year 1986, from $162 billion a year in fiscal 1981. In that earlier article, I contended that, ranked in descending order of their probability, this increase in military spending would severely weaken this country's high-technology civilian industries as materials, equipment and skilled personnel are moved from civilian to military pursuits; produce shortages of materials, equipment and skilled personnel that will create ''bottleneck'' inflation in the sectors where the shortages occur, and stimulate general excess demand inflation in the rest of the economy just as it did during the Vietnam War.
Here are two truths about the Kellogg-Briand Pact.
1. It wanted to outlaw war, so that nothing like The Great War would ever happen again.
2. It failed to have any real impact in keeping nations from pursuing war, and we now call "The Great War" World War I, because it was followed by World War II.
French Minister of Foreign Affairs Aristide Briand and US Secretary of State Frank B. Kellogg were key proponents of the plan, which was signed by various dignitaries at the White House in 1928. The pact stated that the signing nations were "persuaded that the time has come when a frank renunciation of war as an instrument of national policy should be made," and so the signers of the treaty declared their opposition to war. By their example they hoped to encourage other nations of the world to join them in the same commitment.
The pact had little effect.
Answer:
not
Explanation:
because they were all going with your so beautiful ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ yieee na na na na na na na na na all day long and the other guy I can do it for you to get home to try it out and the live of the photos of the kids are you feeling
The answer would be A a new adversity campaign
