Answer:
An "Arms Race" was a race between the 2 super powers to develop weapons of massive destruction which were considered High Class Destruction Weapons. United Socialist Soviet Republics have developed weapons like Inter Continental Ballistic missiles of Medium and Trans-Continental ranges as well as a devastating and terrifying weapon known as the Tsar Bomba which is 57 megatons, 1,500 times more devastating then a bomb on dropped Hiroshima. In fact the Tsar Bomba could leave an explosion behind bigger then all the ammunition, bombs, torpedoes and other weapons used in World War 2 by all countries combined.
Answer:Since the French decided to join the American side as an ally during the American Revolutionary War, they send a bunch of resources, man power(aka soldiers) and more to help their side (they also send Lafayette). Due to all of this, the Americans failed to pay back the debt to France in a short period of time(because their country just started and they need to organize everything), causing French to need to raise the taxes on the common people in their land, making life hard (because they need to feed mouths and their wages aren’t high) and forcing them to start a revolution (poor king that helped the Americans, he got his head chopped up for it).
There are more reasons but this is all I can think of for now.
Answer:
Explanation:In historiography, the term historical revisionism identifies the re-interpretation of an historical account.[1] It usually involves challenging the orthodox (established, accepted or traditional) views held by professional scholars about a historical event or time-span or phenomenon, introducing contrary evidence, or reinterpreting the motivations and decisions of the people involved. The revision of the historical record can reflect new discoveries of fact, evidence, and interpretation, which then results in revised history. In dramatic cases, revisionism involves a reversal of older moral judgments.
At a basic level, legitimate historical revisionism is a common and not especially controversial process of developing and refining the writing of histories. Much more controversial is the reversal of moral findings, whereby what mainstream historians had considered (for example) positive forces are depicted as negative. Such revisionism, if challenged (especially in heated terms) by the supporters of the previous view, can become an illegitimate form of historical revisionism known as historical negationism if it involves inappropriate methods such as:
the use of forged documents or implausible distrust of genuine documents
attributing false conclusions to books and sources
manipulating statistical data
deliberately mis-translating texts
This type of historical revisionism can present a re-interpretation of the moral meaning of the historical record.[2] Negationists use the term "revisionism" to portray their efforts as legitimate historical revisionism. This is especially the case when "revisionism" relates to Holocaust denial.
Answer:
B. his father was assassinated
Explanation:
A. They developed an accurate 365-day calendar. does not accurately describe the civilization of the Maya because the Mayan calendar is different from the other calendars.
