1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sesenic [268]
3 years ago
11

Help me plzzzzz

History
1 answer:
MrRissso [65]3 years ago
4 0

the 1824 election was decided in the house of representatives.

You might be interested in
How did European contact impact indigenous peoples? (Select all that apply.) European goods were traded for native lands. Native
Sedaia [141]

Answer:

The best choices from the options, to be able to answer the question: How did European contact impact indigenous peoples, would be:

B: Native tribes became ill from diseases that were not present until the arrival of Europeans. This is correct as it was not until Europeans arrived in America that such diseases as smallpox, or chickenpox, made an appearance, decimating thousands of Native Americans all over the Americas. It is now known that the arrival of diseases brought by the European settlers was one of the biggest impacts that Europe had on America.

C: Early European settlers attempted to convert Native tribes to their religion. This is especially true for all those tribes who came into contact with the Spanish conquistadores. One of the reasons why the discovery of new lands was supported originally by the Spanish crown, was the desire for the extension of the Gospels. When Columbus found these new lands, and the "savages" in them, a whole movement of Christians, particularly Catholic orders, began to move into the Americas in order to bring the Gospel. Later, with the arrival of the English in America, although at first evangelization was not the main purpose, but rather to find a new place away from religious persecution, it later did become an issue, with Puritans attempting to "civilize" the Indians through religious knowledge. After them, many of the new protestant movements made it their goal to evangelize the savage Native people of the colonies.

None of the other choices is correct, as Europeans traded with Indians for goods, not lands, and since lands were sacred to Indian tribes, they would have never traded them. Also, crops like bananas, coffee, sugar cane and wheat, were brought by the Europeans into the Americas, not taken from the Americas by the Europeans.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the major ways the world was different in 1450 from what it had been in 600, because of Islam
zysi [14]
The spread of Islam changed many countries. The religion quickly spread and many countries of power classified themselves as Muslim countries. This united the countries in a religious manner and all of the Muslim countries were led and ruled by a khalifah. The united rule helped Muslims achieve victory over battles that would change the face of the Earth.
4 0
3 years ago
Beginning in may 1961, this was a series of civil rights actions in which integrated groups of activists rode commercial buses (
kobusy [5.1K]
Yes in May 1961, where a series of civil rights actions in which integrated groups of activists rode a commercial buses for example is a grey hound and trail ways, regardless of the laws in the individual states they passed through. These were designed to test that ruling and help overturn jim crow laws in southern states. these are just some parts of the history that we should always remember.
6 0
3 years ago
Comparing Federalist and Anti-Federalist Positions
OleMash [197]

The interest group that voiced opinions on ratifying the constitution and establishing a more powerful central government was known as the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.

<h3>Who are the Federalists and Anti-Federalists?</h3>

A conflict arose over ratification, with the Federalists supporting a strong union and the Constitution's adoption and the Anti-Federalists opposing the establishment of a powerful national government and rejecting ratification.

In contrast to the Anti-Federalists, who opposed the ratification of the U.S. Constitution in 1787, the Federalists stood for those who favored the establishment of a more powerful federal government.

Because they believed that state constitutions already protected individual rights, the Anti-Federalists opposed a bill of rights in the Constitution.

In exchange for their approval, the Federalists agreed to include the Bill of Rights.

To ensure that the rights would not be revoked by the new federal government, the Anti-Federalists insisted that a bill of rights be included in the Constitution.

To learn more about Anti-Federalists, visit:

brainly.com/question/28622723

#SPJ1

4 0
1 year ago
The colors of Kabuki costumes are used to
ololo11 [35]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

a no the period was well defined

b it was mostly men

c actors didnt have feelings based on colors.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was the treaty with Spain in 1795 important to Americans?
    11·1 answer
  • Which geographic area had the most population and economic activity during the colonial period
    11·2 answers
  • What caused growing sectionalism between 1820 and 1850?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these was used to justify U.S. support for South Vietnam? internationalism McCarthyism the domino theory the nuclear ar
    8·1 answer
  • How did Deng Xiaoping’s undo some of Mao’s influence?
    9·1 answer
  • King Henry left the Catholic Church
    8·1 answer
  • Why dont people like me
    6·1 answer
  • The Monroe Doctrine stated that the United States would not get involved in
    13·2 answers
  • HELP!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • What is the value of looking at belief systems through both frames
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!