Answer:
D. All the Above
Explanation:
A. Lead to greater productivity
This is true because through specialization and competitive advantages you can achieve greater productivity in the production of goods and services. If you have a competitive advantage, it is because you have more capital, infrastructure and specialized human capital in the production of a specific type of good or service so that a greater amount of that good can be produced than another country in the same time.
B. Lead to greater output even if you can do everything better than someone else.
This is true since although a country has a competitive advantage in all industries, concentrating its labor and capital in the production of the good or service in which it has the greatest competitive advantage will allow a higher level of production in that sole good/service than if he divided his resources into the production of other goods and services.
C. Lead to international trade and overall gains for the nations involved.
This point, despite being true, is debatable. In theory, international trade allows to reach greater levels of wealth to the countries involved by being able to exchange the goods in which they have competitive advantage for others that if they were produced in the country they would consume part of their resources by not having such high productivity as if it will trade with a country that does have the capacity to produce it.
Having this clear, we can say that all of the above are true, so the answer is D.
Answer:
12
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the marginal product of adding the 4th worker
Using this formula
MP=ΔTPΔL
Let plug in the formula
ΔTP=57−45
ΔTP=12
Therefore The marginal product of adding the 4th worker is 12 sandwiches.
Answer:
b. Place the company on a restricted list and give only factual information about the company.
Explanation:
There is an ethical problem in the scenario that borders on professional code of conducts in the area of objectivity and independence.
It was stated in the scenario that ''the head of the investment banking department has asked the head of the brokerage unit <u>to change the recommendation from "sell" to "buy."</u>
This is a case of wanting to interfere with the <u>objectivity</u> of the recommendations which should be based on <u>facts not bias</u>.
Secondly, the head of investment banking is trying to interfere with the <u>independence</u> of the head of brokerage unit.
According to the Standards, the head of the brokerage unit would be permitted to place the company on a restricted list and <u>give only factual information</u> about the company.
Answer:
Addison will have $ 1,661 in her account in nine years.
Explanation:
This problem requires us to calculate value of our investment of $ 1000 dollars after nine years. The interest on the investment is 5.8% compounded annually.
This problem can be solved by using simple compounding formula given below.
Future Value = Present Value (1+interest rate%)^-period
Future Value = 1,000 (1+5.8)^9
Future = $ 1,661
The answer is $3,045.
To solve:
Find first the interest.
Interest = Principal x Interest Rate x Time
I = $3000 * .06 * (90/360)
= $3000 * 0.015
= $45
$45 is the interest.
Add the interest to the principal to get the maturity value.
Maturity Value = Interest + Principal
MV = $45 + $3000
= $3045
