No I do not use miracle whip for the reason it does have a gross taste and if left out for a little bit it gets very gross very easily
Answer:
b.use the S-2 employee
Explanation:
Calculation for the the most cost-effective solution
S-1 S-2 S-3
Time for 1 unit (in minutes) 30 24 21
Units in 1 hour 2 2.5 2.857142857
(60/30= 2)
(60/24=2.5)
(60/21=2.857142857)
Wages per hour $ 16.00 $ 19.00 $ 22.00
Wages per/ unit $ 8.00 $7.60 7.70
($ 16.00/2=$8)
($ 19.00/2.5=$ 7.60)
($ 22.00/2.857142857=$ 7.70)
Ranking
S-1 $ 8.00 III
S-2. $7.60 I
S-3 7.70 II
Therefore based on the above Calculation the most cost-effective solution will be to use the S-2 employee
Answer: Piggy backing
Explanation: Piggy back exporting is done by suppliers of a product and entails them supplying a certain function of the business only and just buying the actual product from local sellers. Another option can be that the supplier works with the local seller, and sells the seller's goods on behalf of seller for a commision. The suppliers are known as the carriers and the local sellers are known as the riders.
The customer entering the foregin market is the rider, and the suppliers supplying the parts ahd customer service is the carrier. The customer does not fully need to produce the product from scratch, and is able to acquire this from the suppliers who already have it. The custoemr, who is the rider, is thus able to "ride" on the back of the "carriers" back and ideas set in motion for their product.
Answer:
D) None of these answers are correct
Explanation:
None of the answers are correct because the definiton of current liability is a debt or obligation that has to paid off before the fiscal year ends. In other words, current liabilities are by definition short-term obligations, and all the options in the question refer to long-term obligations.
Answer: Option (c) is correct.
Explanation:
Correct Option: The corporate tax rate increases.
If there is an increase in the corporate tax rate then this will induce the firms to increase the amount of their debt. This is due to the fact that the firms with more debt are going to pay less tax because of the large interest expense. Due to large interest expenses, their income before tax reduces.
Hence, large corporate taxes encourage firms to increase the amount of debt. Therefore, the firms with no debt pays higher taxes than the firms with higher amount of debt.
