Answer:
The correct answer is option B.
Explanation:
As people are using more tablets and fewer television sets, the demand for television sets will decline. This will cause the demand curve to shift to the left. As a result, the price level will decline.
Now, with new production technique the cost of production declines. As a result, there will be an increase in the supply as the firm will be able to produce more at the same cost. This will cause the supply curve to shift to the right. This rightward shift in the supply curve may lead to an increase or decrease in the quantity of output. It depends on the extent of change in supply.
Answer:
a. 4,000
Explanation:
Units in ending inventory
= Units in beginning work in process + Units started into production - Units transferred to the next department
= 2,400 + 10,500 - 8,900
= 4,000 units
Answer:
13%
Explanation:
the new cost of equity = old cost of equity + [(debt / equity) x (old cost of equity - cost of debt)]
the new cost of equity = 12%+ [(20 / 80) x (12% - 8%)] = 12% + 1% = 13%
Since we are in the MM world, taxes do not exist, therefore they are not included in the equation.
Answer:
firm can change output levels without having any significant effect on price.
Explanation:
In the case when we say that the firm is a price taker that means the firm has the power to change the level of an output but this does not have any kind of impact on the price. They accepted the price for the prevailing market and each unit could be sold at the similar market price. It could impact the market price also they enjoy the pricing power
Therefore the above statement should be considered
Answer:
D. Spending on services is smaller than the amount of consumption spending on durable and nondurable goods.
Explanation:
For developed countries like the U.S, there is a lot of stress in consumption of services such as good health care, appropriate and quality education and among others. These services contribute to a larger proportion of consumption component of GDP than both durable and nondurable commodities. Therefore, the statement “spending on services is smaller than the amount of consumption spending on durable and non-durable goods” is not correct