1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ruslelena [56]
3 years ago
11

What was the ancient chinese social organization (60 points please help)

History
1 answer:
leva [86]3 years ago
4 0
The Ancient Chinese society was divided on the basis of Feudal System. This gave rise to social hierarchy of Ancient China by classifying the Chinese people into four social classes:

The lowest class in the ancient Chinese society were Merchants and Traders, they were not considered as respectable people.

Then the second to lowest were the Craftsmen, they were regarded as labours, and also were not given respects and privileges.

Then it comes the Peasant Farmers. They were considered as a higher class compare to the Merchants and Craftsmen, since they work in the farm and provide food, and since agriculture in China was a key element of the entire civilisation.

The second to highest were the scholars, they were considered as the low level aristocratic lineage in the ancient Chinese society.

Finally it comes the highest social class, the King. The King and his family were placed on the top level of the ancient Chinese social pyramid, they were the most respected people and they ruled the people in the entire country.

Apart from them, Soldiers were also very respected, they were the second most respectable people in ancient Chinese society.

Hoped this helped!
You might be interested in
HURRY UP!! WIL MARK BRAINLIST AND GIVE THANKS
iren [92.7K]

Answer: A.the U.S. Government

Explanation: Brainliest plz

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP MEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br>​
ivanzaharov [21]

Answer:

Both had some groups that sought religious freedom

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was worth it? Why or why not?
Vlada [557]
This is a matter of opinion.  Do YOU think the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was worth it?  Let's look at the factors.

What were some of the positives?  Well, firstly, it ended World War II.  That's kind of a big deal.  In fact, it caused Japan not only to surrender, but UNCONDITIONALLY surrender.  Basically, that means the US could ask Japan to do whatever it liked--which the US liked!  Secondly, it was a triumph of science.  The atomic bomb was a revolutionary work of science.  Nothing like it had ever been made before, and it was all based on secrecy and theoretical science.  The atomic bomb also <span>provided the basis for new, improved weapons, including the hydrogen bomb.  </span>Thirdly, it helped establish the United States as a world power.  Knowing about this super powerful weapon the US had, countries were likely to back off!  

But there's a lot of negatives here, too.  Keep in mind that most of these benefits were for the United States alone.  Of course, there was one other BIG negative for the United States, and that's cost.  The atomic bomb was worth billions of dollars!  A second big one wasn't so much for the United States as for the world, especially Japan.  When the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the effects on the people and city were devastating.  People were vaporized.  Cities and buildings were flattened, and nothing is left but carnage.  People died, their skin peeling off, from cancer and radiation.  It was awful!  Thirdly, it caused the arms race.  Knowing the US had this super weapon, ALL the countries started building their own.  Now, we pretty much live in fear of all the nuclear weapons there are today--which are hundreds of times more powerful each than the first bomb!

So what do you think?  Was it worth it?
6 0
4 years ago
One major reason the League of Nations failed was that it?
Doss [256]
The United States wasn't a part of it and the countries that were a part of it didn't take the idea of collective security seriously. When countries attacked others nothing was done.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were Jeffersonians concerned about Hamilton’s economic plans?
iris [78.8K]
Because they didn't understand what true leadership is AND THEY SHOULD JUST GO DIE!!!
excuse me..
but it is because Hamilton wanted to save money and stop slavery, while Jefferson did the opposite, and made it seem innocent that he left slaves out in the field working, and said that they were all happy and working together but he wasn't working the slaves were and yeah
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The 1935 nuremberg laws impacted jews in germany by
    10·1 answer
  • What was a positive result of the reign of terror
    12·2 answers
  • How is a cryptid a modern day animal legend?
    12·2 answers
  • What act limited immigration of people from China?
    7·1 answer
  • Question 4 (4 points)
    5·2 answers
  • Need help please with these​
    6·2 answers
  • The Inquisition in Spain was intended for what purpose?
    8·2 answers
  • .<br> an economic system in which economic deci-<br> sions are made by the government?
    11·1 answer
  • Select ALL the correct answers. Which two factors influenced the United States' purchase of Alaska in 1867? the prospect of gain
    8·2 answers
  • What is the goal of the World Bank?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!