First, the Roman Catholic Church was the only church at this time. As such, it was felt to have a monopoly on religious knowledge and on the relationship between Europeans and God. In other words, the Church could control who went to Heaven and who went to Hell. This gave it tremendous power over people’s lives. The Church did much to determine how people would live since it said what was permissible and what was not.Second, the Church was a major political force during this time. Kings and queens wanted and needed papal approval, particularly when they were somewhat weak (as in times of conflict over succession). This, among other things, allowed the Church to exercise political power as it could help to determine which claimants to a throne would be deemed acceptable. There was a long history of tension between the church and secular authority over this and other political issues.<span>Finally, the Church was deeply involved in economic life. The Church controlled a great deal of land (the main source of wealth at this time), largely because it owned monasteries. By owning all the land connected to the monasteries (often willed to it by people wanting to ensure their own salvation), the Church was a major economic power.</span>
New<span> Hampshire became the ninth state to approve the </span>Constitution<span> in June, but the key States of </span>Virginia and New York<span> were locked in bitter debates. Their failure to </span>ratify<span> would reduce the </span>new<span> union by two large, populated, wealthy states, and would geographically splinter it.</span>
Based on the reading, Upton Sinclair would most likely agree that the government must have a role in regulation of the meatpacking companies.
Hope i helped have a wonderful day, can i get a Brainliest please and thank you...
Anwser/
Explanation:
Colonial powers justify their conquest by asserting that they had a legal in religious obligation to take over the land and culture of indigenous people.
The benifits of colonial rule DOES NOT justify the traumatic experience that the indigenous people experienced.
No, because establishing settlements exploding resources needed to be in consult or in treaty with the indigenous people of that country.
