Yes, you can build a society without social hierarchy. Look back at villages with no mayor, or anyone really as the ‘leader’. Everyone was at everyone’s level, just trying to survive. But when people start to think they are better then everyone else, or they start to horde supplies for just themselves, that is when a social hierarchy starts to occur. So as long as that does not happen, you can create a society without a social hierarchy.
No, you can not build a society without a social hierarchy. A social hierarchy is the bones of society. Monarchy’s, Capitalism, Democracy, etc. they all have a social hierarchy in them. There is always the top dog, and there is always the smaller one. Think of all of the great empires and nations. England, the was a king/queen. Rome, it had emperors, and was also a republic. China, had emperors as well.
(Sorry but you are probably gonna have to fine tune the paragraphs. I made it so you can go either way, yes or no.)
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Poetic Devices- he utilizes a great many representations after similitude.</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
As in a large <em>portion of Leaves of Grass</em><em>,</em> Whitman depicts how all of humankind is a piece of the bigger picture, the <em>earth and the universe</em>.
It's a kind of remains to cinders, residue to clean idea written in his unimaginably wonderful way and <em>method for utilizing the English language.</em>
The idea is old; his way of composing around then, was new and remains new in light of the fact that he was such a <em>virtuoso author.</em>
Quartering Act:
During the French and Indian War, colonists were required by law to house any British soldier or soldiers who asked for a place to stay.
<span>C) the invasion of Poland
It happened in 1939, before all of the other events.
Hope this helps :)</span>
