Answer:
We can make recommendations and conclusions about gender-based violence for our peers.
Regarding the recommendations, we can present arguments such as: A person should not be judged based on their gender, but on their actions and skills, we should not respond to any situation with violent acts, but with kindness and respect, every living being deserves to be respected and treated with consideration.
In relation to conclusions, we can present arguments such as: Everyone has the same rights and duties regardless of their genre, color, sexual orientation and religion. They should not be treated violently because of any of these factors.
Explanation:
Gender-based violence is characterized by the fact that one group of people (usually women) becomes the target of violence by another group of people because of their gender. This is because the aggressors see these victims as inferior and weak, who must be submissive to the wills that the aggressors have and must be punished as they see fit.
Dr. Croteau explains to students in his methodology class that when they are using a mixed design, they are essentially using a(n) factorial design with multiple independent variables.
Methodology is studying the methods used in field and the theories or principles behind them, so that you can develop a approach which matches your requirements.
Mixed design is an approach in which the researcher have to examines both the potential differences between two or more separate groups of participants and also the individual changes over time.
Factorial design is necessary when interactions are there to avoid misleading conclusions. They allow the effects of a factor to be estimated at several levels of a factor, that can yield a conclusion that are valid over a range of experimental conditions.
To learn more about mixed design here
brainly.com/question/13012408
#SPJ4
Answer:
A. Meta-conflict
Explanation:
Meta-conflict is about whether or how to engage in conflict. In case of conflict between Jon and Ana, they further tend to engage in conflict rather than ease it off. "You don't know" is the negation of Ana who does not disagree without losing her temper. Ana, on the other hand, is ready to "confront the issue" which means she is prepared to escalate the conflict. Ana does not believe in avoiding issue, the first lesson in easing conflict. Jon accuses Ana and Ana is ready to confront.
