All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following does NOT exemplify an attempt made by the U.S. government to remove imperial control over other nations?

2 answers:

6 0

I would say d.none of the above
All of those were attempts to remove imperial control over other nations.

Deffense [45]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The correct answer is A. The Jones Act was not an attempt made by the US government to remove imperial control over other nations, as when it was passed, Philippines was being administrated by the United States itself.

Explanation:

-The Jones Act, approved by the 64th Congress of the United States on August 29, 1916, contained the first formal and official statement by the United States that the Philippines would be granted independence. The law stated that independence would be granted as soon as "a stable government was established," which gave the United States government the power to decide when that "stable government" would be installed. The law sought to give the Philippines greater domestic autonomy, although a certain number of privileges were granted to the United States to preserve their sovereign rights and interests.

You might be interested in

Which economic principle closely relate to your own personal beliefs and why? Capitalism, Socialism, or Communism??

NemiM [27]

This depends on what you believe in.

Historically, examples of each can be found in certain area and history of places, including the US for capitalism, P.R.C. for socialism, and the USSR for Communism.

Capitalism: Capitalism is the belief that private citizens should own the means of production as well as distribution, and that the market is not limited in any great way. People are free to produce what they want with little to no boundaries in the areas. Services and goods are provided based on supply and demand, and customers are free to choose which company or government agency to obtain these services and goods from.

Socialism: Socialism can be seen as a "borderline" Communism, in which the means of production, distribution, and exchange is regulated by the community based on what is produced and what is consumed. Socialism does not limit what kind of products appear, however.

Communism: Communism is a step further than Socialism, in which there is a heavily control of the type and amount of a product being produced, as well as what type of products go to the consumers. Different areas may receive different types of products. Communism is also extreme, for it advocates for a classless society, but it fails to do so and instead creates a totalitarian state.

To choose what type of economic principle closely relates to your beliefs, ask yourself some questions:

1) Do you believe in state-regulation? If yes, how much, and what is your limit? The less you believe in it, the more Capitalistic your view. The more you believe it, the more you lean to Communism.

2) Do you believe in having the freedom in being able to choose what type of company's product to buy? If you like to have choice, lean towards the Capitalistic view. If you do not, lean towards Socialism/Communism.

3) Do you believe in the freedom to believe in what you want? Do you believe that everybody has the right to believe in what they want?

If you do, then you will lean towards Capitalism; the less you believe it, the more left you lean.

There are other questions you can ask yourself that would give you a general idea of what you like. You can also find information regarding each sides of beliefs mostly from political and historical sources. In the end, it depends on what you believe in.

3 0

3 years ago

The process of "consultations with the nobles and clergy of the realm" in the making of edward III's decree best reflects which

Leya [2.2K]

The emergence of the concept that parliaments, rather than Kings, had ultimate political authority in European states. I think

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

how is life in turkey today similar to life under the leadership of kemal Atatürk? how is it different?

harkovskaia [24]

Answer:

Turkey as a country under the rule of Erdogan has changed in different ways.

Kemal Ataturk who was the previous President was more democratic in his style of rule. President Erdogan however succeeded him and changed how he ruled the people.

His style of ruling the people has been widely condemned as a step in the wrong direction due to his Islamic Dictatorship rule in the country.

8 0

3 years ago

How did the rise of rationalism pave the way for the Scientific Revolution?

mihalych1998 [28]

Rationalism led to the use of empiricism, or observation, in science. Francis Bacon invented the scientific method based on rationalism. It also lessened overbearing religious dogma

4 0

3 years ago

read the following speech by Lyndon Johnson to the National Association of broadcasters in April of 1968 to answer the question

Scilla [17]

Lyndon B Johnson understood that the public opinion had turned against the war due to its horrific portrayal/

Explanation:

Johnson understood that the public opinion had been against the Vietnam war partly because it was the first war that was so largely televised in the world and seen by the people across the country as something that the nation should not be involved in.

in this address where he says that the nation is going to get out of the war was also rife with a disappointment.

The people had understood finally the atrocity of a needless war and had turned against the agenda of the bureaucracy.

5 0

3 years ago