1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]
3 years ago
7

??can you help me please??? answer??

History
2 answers:
Anna [14]3 years ago
6 0
The right answer is A.
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

A) Gamal Abdel Nasser took over the Suez Canal because he needed the money from It.

Explanation:

Suez Canal joins the Mediterranean and Red Seas across Egypt. Originally it was under British and French control, and Europe needed it as a shipping way for oil from the Middle East.

After WWII, Egypt demanded the evacuation of British troops from the Suez Canal Zone, and Nasser nationalized the canal, expecting to collect fees (hence wanted to make money off it) that could finance the construction of a large dam on the Nile River.

You might be interested in
Why was the victory at Saratoga important to the Americans?
vovikov84 [41]
The victory at Saratoga was the battle after which Burgoyne surrendered his entire army, giving Americans the final element needed to win the Revolutionary War.
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe the complex cause and effect
iragen [17]

Answer: The answer is complex and not straightforward.

Explanation:

The article relates to Churchill and Roosevelt, so is probably dated from World War 2.

Given this and the reference to the use of force by aggressive nations it is reasonable to assume that this refers to the Axis nations and their allies, primarily Germany, Japan and Italy.

What is being referred to is reflected in the policies applied to Germany and Japan at the end of World War 2. (Italy had already switched sides and deposed Mussolini).

In the post war agreements drawn up, Germany and Japan were largely demilitarised with strict control over their armed forces. In the case of West Germany their limited armed forces existed only within the context of NATO to prevent any aggressive use as was evidenced at the beginning of World War 2.

In both instances these countries were not allowed to develop or possess nuclear weapons.

Until such time as there is a global disarmament treaty, as referred to in the article, then countries which are deemed "aggressive", the losers in a conflict, by others, the winners, have arms controls imposed.

Of course this does not and has not stopped the proliferation of weapons, and conflicts throughout the world since 1945, including the aggressive policies of countries such as the UK and the USA.

5 0
3 years ago
What lesson was learned through the Salem Witch Trials?
Archy [21]

Answer:

A lot of things.

Explanation:

Trials should be fair and just, confessions should not be brought upon by torture because it could be far from the truth, children can be influenced greatly by peer pressure to say things that are far by true, and hysteria is a real thing.

7 0
4 years ago
What action was an economic cause of increased tension between the north and south
gavmur [86]

In a nutshell, the protective tariffs were responsible for the development of the economy in the north but had the opposite impact in the south where they had the opposite effect.

This is further explained below.

<h3>What action was an economic cause of increased tension between the north and south?</h3>

Generally, One of the economic factors that contributed to the escalating tensions between the North and the South was the protective tariff. In terms of its economy, the North had developed into an industrialized region and had a large number of enterprises. On the other hand, the South maintained a significant reliance on agricultural production.

To assist the Northern Industries, high protective tariffs were imposed on commodities imported from other countries. Because of this, additional goods had to be purchased from northern vendors.

The South was forced to pay a higher price for the items that they imported from Europe as a result of this tariff, which benefited the North but put a bigger burden on the South.

To summarize, the protective tariffs contributed to the expansion of the economy in the north while having the opposite effect in the south.

Read more about the economy

brainly.com/question/2421251

#SPJ1

CQ

Which of these measures contributed to an increase in the economic tensions that existed between the North and the South?

Dred Scott decision

Protective levies on imports

Bleeding Kansas

The election of Lincoln

5 0
2 years ago
Why did Hannibal go back to North Africa in 203 B.C.7
soldier1979 [14.2K]

Answer:

A . Because he wanted to run for an election

B. Because he wanted to visit his family

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 26. The New Deal Legacy restored a sense of <br>among people.<br>Na Koraremained​
    14·1 answer
  • What was a major similarity between the Korean War and the Vietnam War? A. Both conflicts resulted in decisive victories for com
    5·2 answers
  • HELP ASAP WILL GIVE BRAINILIST
    8·2 answers
  • Why was the Battle of Saratoga historically significant?
    15·1 answer
  • Why is opposition between parties considered healthy and good for politics?
    6·1 answer
  • Why are stories like World War II veteran Pete Shaw’s important to hear more than 75 years later?
    12·1 answer
  • HEY CAN ANYONE PLS ANSWER DIS RQ!!!!!!!!
    8·1 answer
  • Study the graph of the economic growth per person of North Korea and South Korea. A line graph titled Economic Growth of North a
    7·1 answer
  • How has British rule affected India?
    15·2 answers
  • The Articles of Confederation were written before or after the U.S. Constitution? *
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!