Contrary to popular belief, Africa's civil wars are not due to its ethnic and religious diversity. Using recently developed models of the overall prevalence of civil wars in 161 countries between 1960-1999, we draw lessons with special reference to Africa, showing that the relatively higher prevalence of war in Africa is not due to the ethno-linguistic fragmentation of its countries, but rather to high levels of poverty, failed political institutions, and economic dependence on natural resources. We argue that the best and fastest strategy to reduce the prevalence of civil war in Africa and prevent future civil wars is to institute democratic reforms that effectively manage the challenges facing Africa's diverse societies.
Eleanor Roosevelt was the former first lady of the United States of America. She was an activist, political figure, diplomat, and influential.
<h3>Why did Eleanor Roosevelt fight for the rights of the underdog?</h3>
- The former first lady fought for the expanded roles of women in the workplace, the civil rights for Asian and African Americans, and the rights for the refugees of World War II.
- She fought for the underdogs, for the people who did not have social status, equality, and were prosecuted wrongly.
Thus, the given statement is True.
Learn more about <u>Roosevelt </u>here:
brainly.com/question/1286914
Answer:
Rebel, I guess?
Explanation:
I don't see how that phrase can be used as an attempt to go against America. It's simply stating how revolutionaries are made... I may be wrong though so take this with a grain of salt
In 1943, the US got involved in the longest war, the Vietnam War. The President during that time was Lyndon Johnson. He had made a campaign with the pretense that he was a pacifist. However, he later on adopted the viewpoint that the war could not be avoided by the US to enter because of what happened in the Gulf of Tonkin. Because there was no adequate proof about the subject, the US navy did not believe the second attack – the Gulf of Tonkin incident was only a justification for the passing of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. When Congress passed the resolution, President Johnson was given full military power. That started the US into a long and violent war against the North Vietnamese with millions of casualties based on event that never really occurred. The Gulf of Tonkin Incident was merely a justification for a resolution passed by the US Congress to enter in<span>to war against North Vietnam. However, the whole pretense for getting into the war did not happen which makes the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution </span>unconstitutional.<span> </span>
