Answer: $8600
Explanation:
Joint cost allocation:
Product :
Loin chops
Pounds - 3000
Price per pound - $5
ground
Pounds - 10,000
Price per pound - 2.00
ribs
Pounds - 4,000
Price per pound - 4.75
bacon
Pounds - 6,000
Price per pound - 3.50
total joint cost - $43000
Sales cost per product :
Loin chops - 3000 × 5 = $15,000
Ground = 10000 × $2 = $20,000
Ribs - 4000 × $4.75 = $19,000
Bacon - 6000 × $3.50 = $21,000
Loin cost allocation is given by :
Total joint cost × (sales value of Loin chops ÷ Total sales value of all products)
$43,000 × ($15,000 ÷ $(15,000 + 20,000 + 19,000 + 21,000))
$43,000 × ( $15000 ÷ $75000)
$43,000 × 0.2 = $8600
Answer:
a. a decrease in the marginal productivity of her remaining capital and an increase in the marginal productivity of her labor.
Explanation:
Diminishing returns In economics is the decrease in the marginal (incremental) output of a production process as the amount of a single factor of production is incrementally increased, while the amounts of all other factors of production stay constant.
Due to the fire outbreak, the owner will continuously try to increase her manual effort (labor) into the business, which at a point will overwhelm her remaining capital, leading to the decrease in the marginal productivity of what's left of her capital.
Answer:
Answer to the question :
On January 1, 2018, Nath-Langstrom Services, Inc., a computer software training firm, leased several computers under a two-year operating lease agreement from ComputerWorld Leasing, which routinely finances equipment for other firms at an annual interest rate of 4%. The contract calls for four rent payments of $13,000 each, payable semiannually on June 30 and December 31 each year. The computers were acquired by ComputerWorld at a cost of $90,000 and were expected to have a useful life of five years with no residual value. Both firms record amortization and depreciation semi-annually.
Required:
1. Prepare the appropriate entries for both the lessee and the lessor from the beginning of the lease through the end of 2018.
is explained in the attachment.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is: he lacked the mental capacity to enter into the contract.
Explanation:
A person may ratify a contract that he or she established while intoxicated after becoming sober, and therefore become fully responsible for it. Though, if that person wants to reject the contract, proof of mental lack of capacity must be provided to dissolve the contract and any responsibility inherent.