How does Susan B. Anthony argue that women are entitled to vote?

2 answers:

6 0

The answer is A) She states that the founding documents confer rights on all people, including women, and therefore women are entitled to vote. By arguing that the Constitution states that it was "We the People; not we, the white males", Susan B. Anthony argues that the founding documents or the Constitution itself granted women the right to vote when it was written. Her point was that women are people too and that the Constitution had stated that from the beginning women had the right to vote.

EastWind [94]3 years ago

5 0

The answer is “She states that the founding documents confer rights on all people, including women, and therefore women are entitled to vote.” The Constitution mentions people which includes both men and women. This means that women also have the right to vote.

You might be interested in

What was the Cold War?

Alex777 [14]

The Cold War was a period of geopolitics tension between the Soviet Union and the United States and their respective allies.

5 0

3 years ago

Which river played an important role in the expeditions of Lewis and Clark?

Anna [14]

Answer:

its C

Explanation:

that's the right answer

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Can I get help on this pls due soon

Lubov Fominskaja [6]

The "Anti Mask meeting" part because its dipicting its during the time of Late 2019-2021 were we have a mask ordinace thats according this "Unhealthy"

"Anti mask meeting" by it self because it also is telling you that its meant for people who already wear masks and disagree on it.

3: "to protest against" and "Anti mask meeting" dipict that the purpose is to talk and protest against the mask mandate we have in multiple areas.

The point of view of the creator is that the gathering is to protest against the wrongdoings of the mask madate examplifying the creator agrees with the people meeting and seems to intend to join them. Considering he calls the speakers "interesting" which is an opinon he gladly shared which only people do when they truely feel this way, and based on the way it was said it was a good verison of interesting. There for repersenting that he agrees and likes the idea of the meeting.

5 0

3 years ago

In England, a King hath little more to do than to make war and give away [jobs]; which in plain terms, is to impoverish the nati

Zielflug [23.3K]

Answer:

It's A

Explanation:

The nation was impoverished so it needs some creation of jobs by the King in England..

What Thomas Paine wanted..

Hope this helps you.. ;)

I did this a month ago or weeks ago.. :^)

4 0

3 years ago

A long term result of the Monroe Doctrine was that the United States.

Liono4ka [1.6K]

The Monroe Doctrine had a long lasting impact on the foreign policy of the United States. Presidents throughout history invoked the Monroe Doctrine when intervening in foreign affairs in the Western Hemisphere. Here are some examples of the Monroe Doctrine in action.
1865 - The U.S. government helped to overthrow Mexican Emperor Maximilian I who was put in power by the French. He was replaced by President Benito Juarez.
1904 - President Theodore Roosevelt added the "Roosevelt Corollary" to the Monroe Doctrine. He used the doctrine to stop what he called "wrongdoing" in several countries. It was the beginning of the U.S. acting as an international police force in the Americas.
1962 - President John F. Kennedy invoked the Monroe Doctrine during the Cuban Missile Crisis. The U.S. placed a naval quarantine around Cuba to prevent the Soviet Union from installing ballistic missiles on the island.
1982 - President Reagan invoked the Monroe Doctrine to fight communism in the Americas including countries such as Nicaragua and El Salvador.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers