The decisions they make later apply to every similar situation everywhere in the country. For example, there was a case in which students wanted to wear armbands protesting the war, but the school said that was disruptive. The Supreme Court sided with the student, and said they had a right to free speech as long as it wasn’t causing a material interruption. This case would later be the example on how to solve many cases regarding student’s freedom of speech.
Against tyranny federal systems
Answer:
12222221222221121212122121212122122
Explanation:
The best answer is C
The plan to attack France first was a plan by the German Chief of General Staff, Alfred Von Schlieffen which he came up with way back in 1905.
He decided that France was the enemy to be defeated first, with Russia held off until the French were annihilated. He worked out a detailed time timetable that took into account possible French responses to German actions. He believed that Germany would defeat France within six weeks, then after that he would turn his full force on Russia.
Schlieffen plan was heavily modified by his successor Moltke, thus during the outbreak of WWI in 1914, it was not implemented as Schlieffen had envisioned.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that the delegates decided to submit an official statement of grievances against the British Crown for the passage of the Intolerable Acts, which were despised in the colonies.</span></span>
