1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Furkat [3]
3 years ago
6

The Transcontinental Railroad was completed in

History
1 answer:
ArbitrLikvidat [17]3 years ago
6 0
The transcontinental railroad was completed in 1869
You might be interested in
in opposition to the declaration of war against Mexico, what did first term u.s congressman Abraham Lincoln demand to be shown?
Vilka [71]
<span>Elected as a Whig to Congress in 1846, Abraham Lincoln gained notoriety when he lashed out against the Mexican War, calling it immoral, proslavery, and a threat to the nation's republican values. President James K. Polk had called for war, accusing Mexico of shedding of "American blood on American soil.” Lincoln responded by introducing a series of resolutions demanding to know the "particular spot of soil on which the blood of our citizens was so shed." One of Lincoln's constituents branded him "the Benedict Arnold of our district," and he was denied renomination by his own party.
Document: Whereas the President of the United States, in his message of May 11, 1846, has declared that "the Mexican Government not only refused to receive him, [the envoy of the United States,] or listen to his propositions, but, after a long-continued series of menaces, has at last invaded our territory and shed the blood of our fellow-citizens on our own soil:" And again, in his message of December 8, 1846, that "we had ample cause of war against Mexico long before the breaking out of hostilities; but even then we forbore to take redress into our own hands until Mexico herself became the aggressor, by invading our soil in hostile array, and shedding the blood of our citizens:" And yet again, in his message of December 7, 1847, that "the Mexican Government refused even to hear the terms of adjustment which he [our minister of peace] was authorized to propose, and finally, under wholly unjustifiable pretexts, involved the two countries in war, by invading the territory of the State of Texas, striking the first blow, and shedding the blood of our citizens on our own soil." And whereas this House is desirous to obtain a full knowledge of all the facts which go to establish whether the particular spot on which the blood of our citizens was so shed was or was not at that time our own soil: Therefore, Resolved By the House of Representatives, That the President of the United States be respectfully requested to inform this House --1st. Whether the spot on which the blood of our citizens was shed, as in his messages declared, was or was not within the territory of Spain, at least after the treaty of 1819, until the Mexican revolution.2d. Whether that spot is or is not within the territory which was wrested from Spain by the revolutionary Government of Mexico.3d. Whether that spot is or is not within a settlement of people, which settlement has existed ever since long before the Texas revolution, and until its inhabitants fled before the approach of the United States army.4th. Whether that settlement is or is not isolated from any and all other settlements by the Gulf and the Rio Grande on the south and west, and by wide uninhabited regions on the north and east.5th. Whether the people of that settlement, or a majority of them, or any of them, have ever submitted themselves to the government or laws of Texas or the United States, by consent or compulsion, either by accepting office, or voting at elections, or paying tax, or serving on juries, or having process served upon them, or in any other way.6th. Whether the people of that settlement did or did not flee from the approach of the United States army, leaving unprotected their homes and their growing crops, before the blood was shed, as in the messages stated; and whether the first blood, so shed, was or was not shed within the enclosure of one of the people who had thus fled from it.7th. Whether our citizens, whose blood was shed, as in his message declared, were or were not, at that time, armed officers and soldiers, sent into that settlement by the military order of the President, through the Secretary of War.8th. Whether the military force of the United States was or was not sent into that settlement after General Taylor had more than once intimated to the War Department that, in his opinion, no such movement was necessary to the defence or protection of Texas.Source: Abraham Lincoln, “Spot Resolutions,” December 22, 1847Copyright 2016 Digital History         

this is the site i got it from does this help you or no?



</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Which Alabama governor stood in the doorway of the University of Alabama to prevent two African-American students from enrolling
tester [92]
George Wallace is the <span>governor stood in the doorway of the University of Alabama to prevent two African-American students from enrolling.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Which scientist is credited with the collection of the data necessary to support the planet's elliptical motion?
ohaa [14]

Tycho Brahe .....................

5 0
3 years ago
The colonists supported the Stamp Act. A. True B. False
dexar [7]

B false hope it helps I just took the test and it was false

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Names of areas under British control in the 1800s
Darya [45]

Answer:

hope it is use full to you

Explanation:

       The main sources used for this guide are T. O. Lloyd, The British Empire 1558-1983 (Oxford, 1984) and John Stewart, The British Empire: An Encyclopedia of the Crown's Holdings, 1493 through 1995 (London, 1996). I have cross-referenced the information in these two books with a number of other sources to ensure accuracy. For more information, users might consult the following:

 

C A. Bayley, ed., Atlas of the British Empire. (New York, 1989)

U. J. Marshall, ed., The Cambridge Illustrated History of the British Empire. (Cambridge, 1996)

J Holland, ed. The Cambridge History of the British Empire. (Cambridge, 1929-1963)

James Olson and Robert Shadle, ed., Historical Dictionary of the British Empire. (Westport, 1996)

Foundations of Modern Britain series:

Alan G. R. Smith, The Emergence of a Nation State. The Commonwealth of England, 1529-1660. (Longman, 1984)

Geoffrey Holmes, The Making of a Great Power. Late Stuart and Early Georgian Britain 1660-1722. (Longman, 1993)

Geoffrey Holmes and Daniel Szechi, The Age of Oligarchy. Pre-Industrial Britain 1722-1783. (Longman, 1993)

Eric Evans, The Forging of the Modern State. Early Industrial Britain 1783-1870. (Longmand, 1983)

Keith Robins, The Eclipse of a Great Power. Modern Britain 1870-1975. (Longman, 1983)

The British Empire was composed of the dominions, colonies, protectorates, mandates, and other territories ruled or administered by the United Kingdom and its predecessor states. It began with the overseas possessions and trading posts established by England between the late 16th and early 18th centuries. At its height it was the largest empire in history and, for over a century, was the foremost global power.[1] By 1913 the British Empire held sway over 412 million people, 23% of the world population at the time,[2] and by 1925 it covered 35,000,000 km2 (13,500,000 s q mi),[3] 24% of the Earth's total land area. As a result, its constitutional, legal, linguistic, and cultural legacy is widespread. At the peak of its power, it was described as "the empire on which the sun never sets", as the sun was always shining on at least one of its territories.[4]

During the Age of Discovery in the 15th and 16th centuries, Portugal and Spain pioneered European exploration of the globe, and in the process established large overseas empires. Envious of the great wealth these empires generated,[5] England, France, and the Netherlands began to establish colonies and trade networks of their own in the Americas and Asia. A series of wars in the 17th and 18th centuries with the Netherlands and France left England (Britain, following the 1707 Act of Union with Scotland) the dominant colonial power in North America. Britain became the dominant power in the Indian subcontinent after the East India Company's conquest of Mughal Bengal at the Battle of Plassey in 1757.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • After the postwar division of Germany into East and West, what was the state of the German economy?
    13·1 answer
  • What is Benevolent societies in your own words
    12·1 answer
  • Which colonial region was most known for plantations, large numbers of slaves, and the production of rice and tobacco
    7·1 answer
  • The quote below was written in the 1940s:
    15·1 answer
  • Imperialismo en Latinoamérica
    6·2 answers
  • By what year had Rome established a Christian community?
    8·2 answers
  • What did the fugitive free slave law require northerners to do
    10·1 answer
  • Republic of Texas Significant Events Timeline
    9·1 answer
  • how does martin luther king fit into the big picture of history background and history intention? dk if i phrased that correctly
    14·1 answer
  • 1. Where was the imaginary Line of Demarcation<br> drunn?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!