Europeans couldn't control the Africans because the kingdoms that existed there were strong and rich from trade.
<h3>What is trade?</h3>
- Transferring products and services from one person or institution to another includes trade, frequently in exchange for cash.
- A system or network that permits trading is referred to as a market by economists.
- Bartering was a primitive type of trade in which commodities and services were directly exchanged for other goods and services.
- Barter is the practice of exchanging goods without using cash.
<h3>What is economics?</h3>
- The study of economics that examines how products and services are produced, distributed, and consumed.
- Economics is the study of how economies function and the activities and interactions of economic agents.
- Microeconomics is a branch of economics that studies individual actors and markets, as well as how they interact and what happens as a result of those interactions.
Learn more about trade here:
brainly.com/question/27622280
#SPJ4
Your answer is D the stock market crash.
Marquis de Lafayette helped to train the American colonists and even served in battle with them. Lafayette first came to the American colonies in 1777. Upon arrival, was appointed a Major General in the colonial army. From there, he taught the American colonists military techniques, strategies, and other important information needed to defeat the British. He even fought for the American colonists in the Battle of Brandywine. His help was imperative to the colonists success against the British.
Dynastic cycle (traditional Chinese: 朝代循環; simplified Chinese: 朝代循环; pinyin: Cháodài Xúnhuán) is an important political theory in the Chinese history. According to this theory, each dynasty in Chinese history, rises to a political, cultural, and economic peak and then, because of moral corruption, declines, loses the Mandate of Heaven, and falls, only to be replaced by a new dynasty. The cycle then repeats under a surface pattern of repetitive motifs.[1]
It sees a continuity in Chinese history from early times to the present by looking at the succession of empires or dynasties, implying that there is little basic development or change in social or economic structures.[2] John K. Fairbank expressed the doubts of many historians when he wrote that "the concept of the dynastic cycle... has been a major block to the understanding of the fundamental dynamics of Chinese history."[3]
