Answer:
Segregation of Mexican American children in schools would violate both California Law and Federal Law.
Explanation:
In Mendez vs Westminster, the Supreme Court ruled, 8 years before Brown vs Board of Education, that segregated schools were unequal. The Court primarily relied on evidence that Mexican American children were having problems to learn english because of lack of exposure.
In Brown vs Board of Education, the SCOTUS finally prohibited segregated schools accross the United States, because the Court considered that said schools were inherently unequal even if they equal in quality (facilities, teachers, materials), thus, they were a violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.
Segregated schools are forbidden by law in any state.
Answer: B. Spanish authorities in Cuba were accused of atrocities against the people.
Explanation: Based on the question, I believe that these are the answer choices... A. Americans believed that the Spanish had sunk the battleship U.S.S. Maine. B. Spanish authorities in Cuba were accused of atrocities against the people. C. President McKinley declared war to help his chances of winning reelection. D. Yellow journalism stirred up pro-war fervor in the American public. And B is correct.
Answer:
Egyptians built enormous pyramids as tombs for the pharaohs.
and tone it down just a little;)
Congress passed the removal bill that May, and by September Jackson had begun negotiating with the Chickasaws, the Choctaws and the remaining Creeks to move west. Within four years they would be under land cession treaties or on the move. Some Seminoles also left in the early 1830s, and others fought the Army in Florida for several years. But Ross refused even to meet with Jackson. Instead, he turned to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the justices to invalidate Georgia’s removal law.
As the court’s spring session opened in March 1831, Georgia officials roamed the Capitol to rally states’ rights advocates to the idea of stripping the justices of their power to review the acts of state governments. The justices—in an act that historians would say reflected their worry over the talk coming out of Congress—ruled that they lacked jurisdiction over the Cherokees’ claims against Georgia. Chief Justice John Marshall offered their only hope when he wrote that “the Indians are acknowledged to have an unquestionable...right to the lands they occupy.”
