1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mrrafil [7]
3 years ago
14

any guess on how many jews were killed whenever hitler was the president and can you compare that amount to todays killings duri

ng war and get the difference between them
History
2 answers:
irakobra [83]3 years ago
7 0
Around 6 million Jewish people were killed, and to compare the amount of kiling in war today would be very different from war in the past. mainly because there hasn't been a recent genocide.
rewona [7]3 years ago
4 0

there where 11 million people killed in the holocaust and 75 to 80 million die in the war today

You might be interested in
Which statements are true of the Magna Carta? Choose all answers that are correct.
Nata [24]

Answer:

3. The Magna Carta guaranteed that the king could not impose new taxes without permission from a council.

1. English barons and church leaders wrote the Magna Carta because they could no longer tolerate King John's abuses of their traditional rights.

Another way to rephrase the first one is;

Among the many restrictions placed upon the King by the Nobles was the idea that the king could not impose taxes without the approval of the “common counsel” of the Kingdom:

Another way to rephrase the second one is;

The committee of Twenty Five were a group of barons in the forefront of the opposition to King John who were entrusted by the terms of clause 61 of Magna Carta to ensure the king’s compliance with its terms.

The church clergy that helped were Cathedral churches in Salisbury and Lincoln.

Explanation:

Justice

King John’s father, Henry II (r. 1154–89), introduced extensive judicial reforms, established the authority of the royal courts and laid firm foundations for the future system of justice in England. In contrast, John regularly abused the justice system to suppress his opponents and to extort revenue from the barons. The justice system and feudal law were two of the main themes addressed in Magna Carta, and the most famous clause dealt with justice:

No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land.

The barons ensured that numerous other clauses in Magna Carta defined in more detail how the justice system and its officials were to operate. These clauses sought to remedy specific abuses by the king and to make the system more consistent, accessible and fair.

Magna Carta and peace

Many of the clauses towards the end of Magna Carta were practical arrangements for making peace. Rather than looking forward to how the king was to behave in the future, these clauses sought to put right the wrongs done by King John.

The king was immediately to return all hostages, to remove all foreign knights and mercenaries from England, to remit all fines exacted unjustly, and to restore lands, castles and liberties to all who had been wrongfully deprived of them. These clauses were not statements of legal principle, but they were a part of the peace-making process.

All the others are not true as King John had no choice at all.

Perhaps the most radical clause in Magna Carta was the 61st, which set up an elected commission of 25 barons to monitor the king’s compliance with the settlement and to enforce its terms. The 25 barons had the power to seize the king’s property in order to seek redress if he failed to keep the terms imposed on him. This innovative clause demonstrated the power invested in Magna Carta to limit royal authority

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Reserved powers are powers that are reserved for the federal government.
olga55 [171]
The answer is false but don’t quote me on it
8 0
3 years ago
According to the text, what is the relationship between the Iroquois democratic system and the constitution of United States
Andrei [34K]

Answer:

The main way in which the Iroquois Confederacy was like the US government was that both were made up of representatives from groups that originally considered themselves to be separate nations. The Iroquois Confederacy was made up of the Five Nations while the US government was made up of (originally) the 13 states.

Hope this helps you

5 0
3 years ago
Who owns and operates the production facilities in a command economy?
nirvana33 [79]
<span>The government controls all major aspects of the economy . In a command economy, it is the government that decides what to produce, how to produce goods and how to distribute goods and services within the economy. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
In your opinion, what do you think Europe would look like without<br> trade?
gulaghasi [49]
Europe would be nothing
4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were Mary Wollstonecraft beliefs
    6·1 answer
  • When examining the Rosetta Stone, a French scholar found Ptolomy and Cleopatra's names written in Demotic, an Egyptian language,
    10·2 answers
  • What is democratic government
    13·2 answers
  • Which city did the Vandals invade before attacking Rome?
    8·2 answers
  • Which US president worked with civil rights leaders to secure equality and liberty?
    13·2 answers
  • What is the underlying cause of the French and Indian war?
    9·1 answer
  • How did<br> Shakespeare's plays reflect<br> Renaissance ideas?
    7·1 answer
  • Please help me what is the answer?
    8·1 answer
  • The Embargo Act of 1807:
    5·1 answer
  • Gorbachev planned on reforming a failing soviet union through perestroika and glasnost, which mean… question 17 options: freedom
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!