An effective<span> paragraph has three parts: </span>claim<span>, evidence, and analysis. </span>Claim<span>: This is also sometimes called a topic sentence.</span>
Answer:
When it comes to automobiles, there's many pros & cons. Many americans benefit from the invention but is the environment benefiting from it? Could we live without the invention & still do perfectly fine? There's many other alternatives to automobiles but at the same time, they're also useful.
Some pros of the automobile include: more job openings & easier travel. Because of cars, It opened up roads, which opened up some jobs, then there was convenient stores, which opened jobs. Back then people either had to walk or ride a horse to get to where they needed to go, which took a long
Some cons of the automobile include: less exercise & more air pollution. Because of cars, now not as many people walk or bike, which can affect our health in a negative way. Research has showed that cars are the main cause of air pollution which causes some people to have breathing problems & in general isn't healthy to breathe.
Overall, the invention is super useful. (talk about which side youre more for, keeping them or finding alternatives)
I really hope this helps!! Sorry it's not the best
<h2>Answer:</h2>
According to me the statement that best explain the difference between Mr. Dussel's and Mr. Frank's viewpoint is
C. Mr. Dussel believes the Dutch are good people, Mr. Frank does not.
Because in this situation they are actually having a different opinion or point of view about Dutch. So, it explain best the difference between their point of view.
Yeah I think so bc I like the first one but the second one i think it’s correct also but I feel as if it could be “that” but I think your correct
Wooden door vs glass door
Both are doors, serve the same function
Wooden is stronger
Glass you can see through
