Answer:
B) Limited partnership
Explanation:
Limited partnership is one where the partners involved are liable only to the extent to which they contributed to the partnership.
Also some partners only contribute financially. That means they shielded to the extent of their contribution.
In this type of partnership there is least possible regulatory controls, faster decision making, and ease of organisation because partners actually involved in running the business are few or only one person.
It also has the advantage of being a business in which the active partner will not be forced to pay off any business debts from their personal assets.
Answer:
a. is entitled to have the water body maintained in its natural state by other owners.
Explanation:
The Riparian law is usually applied the eastern states of the United States to determine who is legally allowed to use water.
Riparian law states that the owner of a property adjacent to a body of water has the right to use it.
The concept of natural flow states that each Riparian land owner can use water for domestic use and no more. If a owner uses it for other purposes, other Riparian owners can take legal action against them.
Each riparian land owner is supposed to use what they need for domestic purpose so that natural flow is maintained for other riparian users.
Answer:
I'm high
Explanation:
I'm trying to wipe without tp
Answer:
- It is not immediately obvious whether the effect of the conversion of a particular convertible security would be dilutive or antidilutive.
- If the effect of the conversion or exercise of potential common shares would be to increase EPS, the related securities are referred to as antidilutive securities.
- To determine whether convertible securities are dilutive, we can compare the “incremental effect” of the conversion (expressed as a fraction) with the EPS fraction before the effect of any convertible security is considered.
Explanation:
The antidilutive securities may be defined as the financial instruments for which an organization possess at a particular point of time that are not in the form of a common stock. When these antidilutive securities are converted into a common stock, it results in an increase in earnings for one share of the organization. Thus the EPS or the earnings per share increases when the the antidilutive securities are converted into the common stocks.
The following effects of the antidilutive securities on the EPS are true :
- the effects of conversions of any convertible security are not immediately obvious that it would be dilutive or antidilutive.
- when the effect of the conversion or the exercise of any potential common shares is to increase the EPS, then the securities are called as antidilutive securities.
- To know if the convertible securities are dilutive or antidilutive, we have to compare its incremental effect with the EPS before any effect of the conversion.
Answer: D. Both B and C are correct
Explanation:
Based on the scenario and the information provided in the question, we should note that Melissa qualified as a qualifying rekative because there is no age limit on qualifying relatives.
Also, since Melissa doesn't earn any income in 2019 because she's a full time graduate student, Melissa qualifies based on her earned income.
Therefore, option B and C are correct.