1. The scientific idea was to question everything’s and to question things we don’t know
2. They took the ideas of science and questioned what they didn’t know. Previously the unknown was answer by saying it was magic or it was by god
3. Heliocentric theory, the human body such as the heart and how the veins work, new medication
4. Through the printing press which published more books was well as coffee houses and salons.
5. They used the idea of question everything to question absolute monarchy’s. So they questioned the role of kings and social classes. Writers like Lock and Rossuo would theorize popular sovereignty.
6. Rossuo came up with the theory of popular sovereignty. This would lead to absolute monarchs not caring about there people so the idea of popular sovereignty was the influence for the French Revolution which ended with Napoleon so he spread those ideas through Europe so eventually most countries would experience revolution
8. Popular sovereignty where they out they out the will of the people before their selfs.
Answer:
The Anasazi built their dwellings under overhanging cliffs to protect them from the elements. Anasazi means "ancient outsiders." Like many peoples during the agricultural era, the Anasazi employed a wide variety of means to grow high-yield crops in areas of low rainfall.
Explanation:
The correct answer is C the supreme court i just took the test.
<span>
The Congress shall have Power - To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
The clause grants Congress the authority to make laws which would establish the federal powers, the basis of Federalism (the authority of the federal government vis a vis state and individual powers and rights). The extent of the power and authority of the federal government was the primary concern of the thirteen colonies and the main issue discussed in the Federalist Papers written to advance the ratification of the Constitution.
For many decades, the interpretation of the Necessary-and-Proper Clause was a powerful bone of contention between the Democratic-Republican Party and the Federalist Party, and several other political parties in the United States. While Democrats expressed concern that the clause would grant the federal government boundless power, Federalists argued that the clause would only permit execution of power already granted by the constitution.</span>Source(s):<span>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessary-a...</span>
I believe here are always a certain amount of risk involved in human relations, that is because human behaviour is not a 100% predictable. Even if there are big schemes of human personalities, so many little things can vary.