Answer:
Resource mobilization theory
Explanation:
Resource mobilization theory looks at how resources such as time, money, and skills determines the success of social movements. It is a unique theory that analyses factors from outside of social movements.
The theory concentrates on the methods a social movement uses to mobilise support and successfully compete with other social movements.
In the given scenario the students wanted to create a social movement focused on university workers that did not receive living wage and other health benefits.
However because they had trouble recruiting new supporters, could not align themselves with other groups on campus, and did not know how to use social media to draw attention to their cause they failed.
The students were not able to effectively mobilise resources needed to make the social movement successful
Answer:
-0.136 and $528
Explanation:
Given that
p = 50 - 0.5Q
where,
Q = 88
So, p equals to
= 50 - 0.5 × 88
= 50 - 44
= $6
As it is mentioned that
p = 50 - 0.5Q
0.5Q = 50 - p
Q = 100 - 2p
And we know that
Price elasticity of demand is
= Percentage Change in quantity demanded ÷ Percentage Change in price
So,
= -2 × (6 ÷ 88)
= -0.136
And, the revenue is
= Price × Quantity
= $6 × 88
= $528
Answer:Sideward Influence
Explanation:
Sideward Influence involves managing the project manager's peers to ensure collaboration, rather than competition.
It is however important to clarify their requirements of the project and their impacts on the project as separate groups.
Answer: New debt is preferable to new equity
Explanation: In simple words, pecking order theory refers to the corporate finance phenomenon which states that managers of a company finance their company on the basis of three sources and always prefers one over the other.
As per this theory the first preference for the manager is retained earnings, second option should be debt and the last resort should be equity. A manager following pecking order theory focuses on decreasing the risk of financing rather than the cost of capital.
