Please help me out if you can, I’ll give you brainliest

History

2 answers:

viva [34]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Now that the colonies are united as a whole, finding a fair and just way of government is very crucial and important. A king/monarchy was not an effective or fair way of leadership for the colonies previously, so a monarchy should not be instated. Each state having its own laws, leaders, and separated economy is a possibility, however it would not be the most effective choice. Each state having drastically different ways of living would increase tensions and create divisions among the people. The option that would be most correct would be having representative from every state come together as a committee, and that committee would be in charge of creating laws and enforcing the laws. This would be the most reasonable option because it would ensure that every state had representation and the decisions would be made in the best interests of every citizen, not only a select few.

MrRa [10]3 years ago

4 0

Explanation:

okay since the pple don't want a king maybe they should come up with a constitution and make rules that suit and benefit every citizen in one way or another and maybe appoint one person to be in charge of the constitution

You might be interested in

Why didn't the 1919 league of nations really work out?

Bogdan [553]

The 1919 League of Nations was the first diplomatic organization which had as main goal to maintain peace, promote international cooperation and prevent another world war from happening, it was created after Word War I and failed it's purpose and dissolved with World War II.

The League of Nations failed mostly because of the absence of powerful nations such as United State, it was dominated by England and France which were imperialist nations that wanted to spread their empire and some nations like Germany and the Soviet Union were not allowed to join. Another cause of its failure was its structure, it required unanimous votes for taking actions, which made very difficult to achieve goals and when countries attacked each other the League of Nations couldn't do anything about it because it lacked it's own army. The League of Nations had to uphold the Treaty of Versailles which placed Germany as the country who lost the World War I, which made the League of Nations seem not neutral, and Germans didn't respect it.

The League of Nations was dissolved and replaced with the United Nations after World War II.

5 0

3 years ago

November 8, 1787

amm1812

Hi, Based on the text I can conclude that this statement is most likely a statement from the Anti-Federalists papers. The reason for this is because it supports them. I hope this helps you! : )

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What did the ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson establish? 

n200080 [17]

Answer:

plessy vs. ferguson was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation laws for public facilities as long as the segregated facilities were equal in quality – a doctrine that came to be known as "separate but equal".

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

What are some grievances the slaves in Haiti experienced?

vekshin1

Among the causes of the conflicts were the affranchis' frustrations with a racist society, turmoil created in the colony by the French Revolution, nationalistic rhetoric expressed during Vodou ceremonies, the continuing brutality of slave owners, and wars between European powers.

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

13. What title was given to James Madison for his work at the Constitutional Convention? A. Sage of Montpelier B. Father of the

9966 [12]

Number 13 is B.) father of the constitution
Number 14 is either C or D, i'm sorry I'm not sure between the two.
I hope this helps cx

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers