Please help me out if you can, I’ll give you brainliest

History

2 answers:

viva [34]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Now that the colonies are united as a whole, finding a fair and just way of government is very crucial and important. A king/monarchy was not an effective or fair way of leadership for the colonies previously, so a monarchy should not be instated. Each state having its own laws, leaders, and separated economy is a possibility, however it would not be the most effective choice. Each state having drastically different ways of living would increase tensions and create divisions among the people. The option that would be most correct would be having representative from every state come together as a committee, and that committee would be in charge of creating laws and enforcing the laws. This would be the most reasonable option because it would ensure that every state had representation and the decisions would be made in the best interests of every citizen, not only a select few.

MrRa [10]3 years ago

4 0

Explanation:

okay since the pple don't want a king maybe they should come up with a constitution and make rules that suit and benefit every citizen in one way or another and maybe appoint one person to be in charge of the constitution

You might be interested in

Which foundational U.S. document was produced FIRST in response to the Sugar, Stamp, Townshend, Quartering, and Tea Acts?

Mrac [35]

Answer: the Declaration of Independence

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

The Iliad and the Odyssey are famous epics written by which Greek poet?

Nesterboy [21]

Answer: Homer

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Underline the sentence that

Paul [167]

At first, he had the intention of attacking Clinton; however, he later changed his mind and decided to attack Cornwallis instead.

<h3>Who is General Washington?</h3>

Generally, When civilians who escaped the forces commanded by General Howe returned to their houses, they discovered that they had been pillaged.

It turned out that Washington was a greater commander than he was a military thinker. It wasn't so much his brilliance on the field of battle as it was his ability to hold the struggling colonial army together that made him so powerful.

His men had insufficient training and lacked essential supplies including food, ammo, and other provisions (soldiers sometimes even went without shoes in winter).

During the American Revolutionary War, General George Washington successfully led the American army to victory. During the Revolutionary War, Washington distinguished himself as a competent and resilient head of the American armed forces, despite the fact that he had very little experience in the actual management of big conventional armies.