1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
-Dominant- [34]
3 years ago
13

PLEASE HURRY!!!!!!!

History
1 answer:
fgiga [73]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

I think that going state-by-state was smarter because although the effects would not be as widespread, it would be easier to obtain the result desired of obtaining the right to vote. It would have been very hard to get the amount needed (2/3 of all states) to obtain the amendment with no prior suffrage laws. Some state governments were not very inclined to let women vote, so this was a huge barrier that could be somewhat bypassed by just going one state at a time

You might be interested in
What best defines due process of law?
Mars2501 [29]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

it means fair treatment in law

3 0
3 years ago
Author’s Methods: Which statement below is a claim that Jefferson makes about governments?
OverLord2011 [107]

"That to secure these rights (life, liberty, pursuit of happiness), Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do you think family members of those lost on 9/11 participate in memorial events, including reading the names of the decease
Tcecarenko [31]

Answer:

I think family members of those lost on 9/11 participate in memorial events to remember and honor their loved ones.

hope this helps!

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which answer below best describes the First and Second Industrial Revolutions?
Naddika [18.5K]
2, the first IR shifted into water based machinery and the second IR shifted into industrial machinery.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the Patricians let the Plebeians
DiKsa [7]

Answer:

There was a major conflict between the Patricians and the Plebeians called Struggle of Orders, while both sides were on a strike Patricians realized that it was too much of a hassle to do all the work of the Plebeians, therefor they allowed a Plebeian consul.

If the government was run of Patricians the lower class, aka.. the Plebeians would not have a say, and the rich upper class would have all the power.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How can a strong ruler or government bring order to a society​
    13·2 answers
  • Why was victory in the Persian Wars so important for Athens?
    15·2 answers
  • How did the War Powers Resolution affect the relationship between branches
    5·1 answer
  • Why did Abraham Lincoln win the presidency?
    8·2 answers
  • Why was it wad essential for fedrick Douglas that he was a man
    8·1 answer
  • During Reconstruction, the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment outlawed slavery in the United States. gave all women the right t
    8·2 answers
  • What are the differences and similarities of east and west africa? Unit 10 lesson
    12·2 answers
  • How did the domestication of animals help people?
    7·2 answers
  • Please help me with my history work for the stock market crash
    14·2 answers
  • 1) What does it take to win the presidency?<br><br>​
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!