1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
-Dominant- [34]
3 years ago
13

PLEASE HURRY!!!!!!!

History
1 answer:
fgiga [73]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

I think that going state-by-state was smarter because although the effects would not be as widespread, it would be easier to obtain the result desired of obtaining the right to vote. It would have been very hard to get the amount needed (2/3 of all states) to obtain the amendment with no prior suffrage laws. Some state governments were not very inclined to let women vote, so this was a huge barrier that could be somewhat bypassed by just going one state at a time

You might be interested in
Why did some Native Americans agree to live at the mission
Inga [223]
They agreed either because they were forced by their chief or the Spaniards or because they wanted to.
3 0
3 years ago
What is the significance of the Cold War on the world today
prohojiy [21]
The Cold war has also affected us today by helping the West evade Communist rule; without intervention from The U.S. forces China and The Soviet Union might have conquered Europe and The U.S.. Finally, The Cold War helped form modern day friendships, alliances and hostilities between countries.
3 0
3 years ago
How did US involvement in Vietnam impact the nation during the 1960s?
vova2212 [387]

More than 3 million people (including over 58,000 Americans) were killed in the Vietnam War

4 0
3 years ago
an economic theroy that stresses government management of the production an distribution of goods is ​
Sedaia [141]

A economic theory that stresses government management of the production an distribution of goods is ​Socialism. Socialism is a theory where all of the moves, makings, or trading profits should be owned by the whole community, not just a few people. The reason why socialism would be your answer is because the government wants the have ownership of all of the goods and profits they make from things like trading and sales, and this especially effects the Government management that prioritize the distribution of goods, which helps out the economy. Socialism would not give all the power to the government, but also give power to the people too, and the government doesn't like that since they want all of the power to themselves, including all profits made from trades and sales.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did progressives hope to make government more efficient and responsive to citizens
MA_775_DIABLO [31]
They made numerous committees and agencies to fight corruption both in the government and the private sector. These agencies and committees would revise companies and see if they were bad to the workers and would protect the workers more which reduced the company's powers.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How has the contemporary legislative branch responded to factions?
    7·2 answers
  • Briefly explain the four reasons Social change movements erupted in the United States in the 1960s.
    9·1 answer
  • Important rock and roll artist and groups in the 1990s and early 21st century included which
    12·2 answers
  • Which theme from Macbeth do these lines support? Say from whence. You owe this strange intelligence, or why. Upon this blasted h
    10·1 answer
  • In what did both the Mayans and the Egyptians show an interest?
    10·2 answers
  • Which is the best example of militarisms impact on world war 1?
    13·1 answer
  • The U.S. military provides protection to every citizen of the United States, ensuring the
    7·1 answer
  • Dhdhshzbbxbfjesj d ew d​
    5·2 answers
  • Who was John Wilkes booth
    5·2 answers
  • Why do you think Congress had to create this Amendment?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!