Well I have to write 20 characters so this is it the answers are in the photo <3
Explanation:
The common noun here is "frog" as the only other noun, Many, is not a common noun - it's a proper noun.
"frog" here is the object of the sentence: it's the object of the verb "caught" of which the subject is Mary
Answer:
i havent read the book in awhile but...
Explanation:
he took the road less traveled by... by when he crossed the boundre outside and released all the memorys to everyone so everyone could feel them not just one person?
sorry i have no qoutes but thats and idea to go off of?
Answer:
His love for himself
Explanation:
There is little to no mention of Narcissus being angry at either Hera or Artemis.
He did not envy his reflection, he only longed to be with it.
He did not love Echo, and actually rejected her, which is why he was cursed to love his own reflection.
So yeah, he loved himself.
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
I have trouble believing Mr. Sawicki's characterization of Steve, because he knows Steve only in school. Since Mr. Sawicki does not know Steve outside of school, he cannot make a judgment about what Steve has been doing in his neighborhood or who his friends are. Sawicki says Steve is honest, but even if Steve is good or honest in Mr. Sawicki's opinion, good people can still make mistakes.
What did you consider when you were writing your answer? Check all that apply.
what Mr. Sawicki says
. what other people say
. whether Steve is guilty or innocent
. what Steve has said
Answer:
what Mr. Sawicki says
Explanation:
The answer shown in the text above was created considering only what Mr. Sawicki says about Steve. The answer states that Steve's characterization through what Mr. Sawicki says is not reliable. That's because Mr. Sawicki doesn't know Steve fully and only knows his behavior in one place, at school. Mr. Sawicki does not know anything about Steve and does not even know how he behaves outside of school, so he cannot say that Steve is honest. In other words, Mr. Sawicki's speech is imprecise, it lacks evidence and therefore cannot be trusted.
