Answer:
$1,247.12
Explanation:
For computing the asked price we need to apply the present value formula i.e to be shown in the attachment below
Given that,
Future value = $1,000
Rate of interest = 4.151% ÷ 2 = 2.076%
NPER = 17 years × 2 = 34 years
The 20 years come from May 2019 to May 2036
PMT = $1,000 × 6.193% ÷ 2 = $30.965
The formula is shown below:
= -PV(Rate;NPER;PMT;FV;type)
So, after applying the above formula, the present value or the ask price is $1,247.12
Answer:
Correct Answer:
C) issuance of a stock certificate
Explanation:
In the model developed by group working for NASAA which was to disclose model fee and cost involved in doing business with them, it would disclose all associated cost involved. <em>The only thing it would not disclose would be regards to stock certificate issuance since it falls outside their perview.</em>
Answer:
Sublimation
Explanation:
Sublimation is the process of channelling negative, socially-unacceptable feelings, toward productive, or socially-acceptable abilities.
The concept was developed by Freud, especially in his work "Madness and Civilization".
Freud basically said that sublimation is what allowed humans to live in society, however, he also warned that sublimation did not always work, and some people were less likely to behave than others, leading to for example, the presence of criminality and antisocial behaviour.
Answer:
The answer is $56.68
Explanation:
Solution
We recall that:
The firm paid a dividend of =$7.80
The projected growth of dividends is at a rate = 9.0%
The annual return = 24.0%
Now,
V = ($7.80 * (1.09)/(.24 - 0.9)
= (8.502)/(.24-0.9)
= (8.502) * (-0.66)
= $56.68
Therefore, this would be the most we would pay for the stock. If we paid less than that, our return would be above the 24%.
Answer:
2. (i) demand-side; (ii) both; (iii) supply-side; (iv) supply-side; (v) both
Explanation:
a. $1,000 per person tax reduction ⇒ focus on aggregate demand (more money for consumers to spend)
b. a 5% reduction in all tax rates ⇒ focus on both aggregate demand and supply (more money for consumers and suppliers)
c. Pell Grants, which are government subsidies for college education ⇒ focus on aggregate supply (more money for suppliers of college education)
d. government-sponsored prizes for new scientific discoveries ⇒ focus on aggregate supply (more money for suppliers of new scientific discoveries)
e. an increase in unemployment compensation ⇒ focus on both aggregate demand and supply (more money for consumers resulting in higher prices and lower output)
