1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Hatshy [7]
3 years ago
8

Cleo writes a check for $100 drawn on debit & credit bank and presents it to elegant jewelers for payment. if the check is n

ot backed by sufficient funds and intent to defraud can be proved, cleo may be prosecuted for
Business
1 answer:
Drupady [299]3 years ago
4 0
<span>Cleo may be prosecuted for </span>fraud for unlawful issuance of check. This happens when the owner will request for a check but her account does not have enough money as what the check stated.
You might be interested in
Russ Wyant owned Humble Ranch in Perkins County, South Dakota. Edward Humble, whose parents had previously owned the ranch, was
Leona [35]

Answer:

Cosnider the following text.

Explanation:

In accordance with the United Stated Contract Law, peformance must form an integral part of the contract and any of it's clauses, along with consideration for the same.

As seen in the case above, specific provisions in the contract provide for the possibility of the seller becoming the buyer's lender by matching the terms of the proposed financing. However, it must be understood that a decision taken about the same by either one party is not binding on the other, and comes into effect only if it is mutually agreed upon under the same terms.

In the case above, Russ' uncle, Edward has exercised his two year option to buy the land from Russ, which if exercised, gave the parties 30 days to conclude the sale. However, as seen in the question, Russ's uncle, Edward was unresponsive to Russ' proposed purchase plan, indicating that he was aware of the terms of the contract and Russ' proposal, yet chose not to act on it. However, owing to the time clause in the contract, failure to respond an come to an agreement by either of the parties within the specified time, would render it void. Furthermore, Edward did not advise Russ on the financing terms pertaining to the contract before it's expiry, indicating that he had no interest in performing the contract.

Therefore, it should be understoof that Edward is not entitled to specific performance as a remedy in this case, as it is his fault and not Russ' fault for the non-performance of his part of the contract. He does not have any remedy at all, unless he is able to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Russ had not made efforts to communicate with him. Russ on the other hand, can sue Edward according to the terms of the contract and seek damages accordingly.

6 0
3 years ago
Live Forever Life Insurance Co. is selling a perpetuity contract that pays $1,600 monthly. The contract currently sells for $117
Tanzania [10]

Answer:

The monthly return on this investment vehicle is 1.37%

Explanation:

A perpetuity contract is one which lasts forever, It does not any time limit. Live Forever Life Insurance Co will pay $1,600 for indefinite time on today's investment of #117,000.

Monthly return will be calculated using following formula:

Present value of Perpetuity = Perpetuity Received / Interest rate

$117,000 = $1,600 / r

r = $1,600 / $117,000

r = 1.37%

Monthly return on the perpetuity is 1.37% for this perpetuity.

4 0
3 years ago
Katrina receives an offer to buy a box of candy through the mail each month. The letter says that she will begin receiving candy
Katarina [22]

Answer:D. Does not constitute an acceptance of the offer.

Explanation:A Contract is a binding agreement between two persons with sound mind, contract agreements are contestable in the Courts,but for it to be acceptable as an evidence in the court of law certain prescribed conditions must be met.

Their was no agreement between Katrina and the company candy company, because her consent was not sort by the Company,the company should have sort her consent and if possible get her to sign certain agreement that will prevent Indiscriminate violation of the terms of agreement.

3 0
3 years ago
At Halsted Medical Products Corp., all assembly workers must wear specialized gear to prevent possible injuries from minute part
Pavlova-9 [17]

Answer:

b. Feedforward control

Explanation:

Feedforward control is a form of proactive control that includes measures that pertain to prevent certain consequences and safety hazards. This company wants to prevent their employees form getting injured from particles during manufacturing. So, this is an example of feedforward control, that aims to prevent, not react.

7 0
3 years ago
g Product #1 Product #2 Historical cost $26 $51 Replacement cost 16 28 Estimated cost to dispose 23 25 Estimated selling price 5
Darya [45]

Answer:Product 1 will be valued at $16,  Product 2 will be valued at $29

Explanation:

Lower of Cost or Market

Lower of Cost or Market is a Method for Valuing inventory which stipulates  that inventory must be valued at the lower of cost or market price. Market price is defined as the replacement cost of inventory. There is however a Criteria to be followed when using Replacement costs

The replacement cost should not exceed or should not be greater than the Net Realizable Value, Net Realizable Value is the net amount we would receive from the sale of inventory after settling cost of selling inventory. If Replacement Cost is greater than Net relizable value, Net Realizable Value will be compared to historical cost in determining the value of inventory

The Replacement Cost Should also not be less than Net relizable value minus Ordinary profit, if it is less , Net relizable value minus Ordinary profit will be compare to historical costs in determining the value of inventory.

Replacement costs will be used if they are lower than Net realizable value and Higher than Net relizable value minus Ordinary profit

Product 1

Historical cost = $26

Net Realizable Value = $52 - 23 = $29

Net realizable Value minus Ordinary Profit = $29 - ( 52 -26) = $3

Replacement Cost $16

Replacement costs ($16) are less than Net realizable value ($29) But they are higher than Net realizable value minus Ordinary Profit ($3),. Product 1 will be valued at the lower of cost $26 or $16

Product 1 will be valued at $16

Product 2

Historical cost = $51

Net Realizable Value = $80 - 25 = $55

Net realizable Value minus Ordinary Profit = $29 - ( $80 -51) = $29

Replacement Cost $28

Replacement costs ($28) are less than Net realizable value ($55). They are also lower than Net realizable value minus Ordinary Profit ($29). Product 2 will be valued at the lower of cost $51 or $29

Product 2 will be valued at $29

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Pine Street Inc. makes unfinished bookcases that it sells for $59.37. Production costs are $37.59 variable and $9.54 fixed. Beca
    8·1 answer
  • When might be the best time to start saving for retirement?
    5·1 answer
  • Dominic is the founder of an innovative "impromptu catering" business that provides elegant, healthy party food and decorations
    11·1 answer
  • What actions does the U.S. government take to ensure competition?
    8·1 answer
  • Nation A makes is illegal for its citizens to own more than one vehicle in order to reduce emissions. Nation A’s neighbor Nation
    15·1 answer
  • Assume that China imports a significant amount of coffee beans from Vietnam.
    9·1 answer
  • How much will a company's net operating income change if it undertakes an advertising campaign given the following data: Cost of
    9·1 answer
  • Please choose A, B, C, or D
    14·2 answers
  • The concept referring to the rights inherent in a supervisory position to give orders and expect the orders to be obeyed is:____
    15·1 answer
  • although both tariffs and quotas are tools used to restrict or reduce trade, which of the statements best describes their differ
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!