Answer:
- Attacked by the school bully,
- Slipping on the wet sidewalk,
Explanation:
Dangling modifiers occur when the modifiers are far from the object they modify. As a result, the meaning of the sentence is confusing, obscure, ambiguous or senseless.
In the first sentence, it is unclear to deduce whether the backpack or Abner were attacked by the school bully. Thus, the right version could be:
<em>The backpack fell from Abner's shoulder when he was attacked by the school bully</em>.
In the third sentence, it is not precise to figure out whether Amaury or the keys were slipping on the wet sidewalk. As a result, the modifier should be placed closer to the modified object, as it stated in the second sentence:
<em>When Amaury slipped on the wet sidewalk, the keys fell from his pocket.</em>
C. From the several types of evidence that can be presented at trial, including eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence is the most reliable.
Im positive its C.
It could be google or something XD
Answer:
Clear as mud?
Let’s deconstruct an example from the great Winston Churchill. All the power words are underlined:
We have before us an<u> ordeal</u> of the most <u>grievous</u> kind. We have before us many, many long months of <u>struggle</u> and of <u>suffering</u>. You ask, what is our policy? I can say: It is to wage <u>war</u>, by sea, land and air, with all our <u>might</u> and with all the<u> strength </u>that God can give us; to wage<u> war against </u>a monstrous tyranny, never <u>surpassed</u> in the dark, lamentable catalogue of<u> human crime</u>. That is our <u>policy</u>. You ask, what is our<u> aim?</u> I can answer in one word: It is <u>victory, </u>victory at all costs, victory in spite of all<u> terror, victory</u>, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no <u>survival.
</u>
Inspiring, right?