The Federalists believed that the 0 should possess all powers not specifically denied to it.
In short, Southern citizens wanted more land and they only way they could get more land was to work with the Federal government to remove the tribes that were on the land from their land.
So, the Indian Removal Act made it possible to relocate tribes to reservations. The relocation is known as the trail of tears for the hardship the Native Americans faced on that journey.
Answer and Explanation:
<u>A country that was </u><u>NOT</u><u> an ally to the United States during WW1 is Germany.</u>
Germany was the country the Allies were fighting against.
<u><em>#teamtrees #PAW (Plant And Water)</em></u>
Even is he existed, he is dead for centuries.
Explanation:
- The lack of credible material and written sources related to the narratives of Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table might suggest that historical Arthur did not even exist.
- Yet, the prevalence of Arthurian legends in European culture require particular caution from historians who address the issue.
- Depending on what attitude historians have about oral tradition, its significance and role, different, sometimes even completely opposite, answers are formed to the question of whether or not legends are based on truth.
- Some historians still deny the existence of King Arthur today, while others emphasize his enormous role in sixteenth-century British history.
- The truth, as usual, is probably somewhere in between, so today is the most accepted viewpoint that speaks in favor of the existence of Arthur, but only as a warlord or local lord of some of the disparate areas inhabited by the Celtic tribes - the Britons.
Learn more on King Arthur on
brainly.com/question/558817
brainly.com/question/2673644
#learnwithBrainly
