for the most part, historians view Andrew Johnson as the worst possible person to have served as President at the end of the American Civil War. Because of his gross incompetence in federal office and his incredible miscalculation of the extent of public support for his policies, Johnson is judged as a great failure in making a satisfying and just peace. He is viewed to have been a rigid, dictatorial racist who was unable to compromise or to accept a political reality at odds with his own ideas. Instead of forging a compromise between Radical Republicans and moderates, his actions united the opposition against him. His bullheaded opposition to the Freedmen's Bureau Bill, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and the Fourteenth Amendment eliminated all hope of using presidential authority to affect further compromises favorable to his position. In the end, Johnson did more to extend the period of national strife than he did to heal the wounds of war.
Most importantly, Johnson's strong commitment to obstructing political and civil rights for blacks is principally responsible for the failure of Reconstruction to solve the race problem in the South and perhaps in America as well. Johnson's decision to support the return of the prewar social and economic system—except for slavery—cut short any hope of a redistribution of land to the freed people or a more far-reaching reform program in the South.
Historians naturally wonder what might have happened had Lincoln, a genius at political compromise and perhaps the most effective leader to ever serve as President, lived. Would African Americans have obtained more effective guarantees of their civil rights? Would Lincoln have better completed what one historian calls the "unfinished revolution" in racial justice and equality begun by the Civil War? Almost all historians believe that the outcome would have been far different under Lincoln's leadership.
Among historians, supporters of Johnson are few in recent years. However, from the 1870s to around the time of World War II, Johnson enjoyed high regard as a strong-willed President who took the courageous high ground in challenging Congress's unconstitutional usurpation of presidential authority. In this view, much out of vogue today, Johnson is seen to have been motivated by a strict constructionist interpretation of the Constitution and by a firm belief in the separation of powers. This perspective reflected a generation of historians who were critical of Republican policy and skeptical of the viability of racial equality as a national policy. Even here, however, apologists for Johnson acknowledge his inability to effectively deal with congressional challenges due to his personal limitations as a leader.
The people in these times regarded the system regarded these as inferior due to the fact that they had the colonial mentality and felt inferior to the whites.
<h3>The reason the people regarded these things as inferior</h3>
This was because they had been filled with the mentality that the white man's ways were better.
Before they were colonized, they already had their systems in place. They had their ways of writing, dressing and also had war equipment like the Lantakas.
Read more on Philippines here: brainly.com/question/25670011
Answer:
Cuba it is an island in Cuba
Explanation:
I just know :)
Hope it helped :) Have an Amazing Day
The Seminoles were a Native American tribe in Florida, they consisted of other tribes kicked out of their land. They launched raids on settlers in northern Florida and Southern Georgia, so I'm pretty sure if you are being raided by a group of people you want them gone.
<span>Good Morning!
</span><span>A) government positions.
</span><span>
Kennedy gained some confidence from the black movements as he secured seats for people in this group in government positions. Kennedy's sympathy for Martin Luther King is an example of his participation in this field.
Hugs!</span>
