In the "person-situation debate" amongst psychologists, Traits are a false notion. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be beneficial to examine how they respond differently in particular circumstances.
<h3>Which side of the person-situation argument did Mischel take?</h3>
In the psychological community's "person-situation argument," Walter Mischel played a significant role. Character traits are a myth. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be useful to examine the various responses in particular circumstances.
<h3>What exactly is the person-situation argument?</h3>
Nature versus. nurture argument in personality psychology concerns which factor, a person or an environment, is more crucial in predicting what people will do. There is too much variation in behavior across contexts for attributes to adequately describe individual variations.
Learn more about psychologists here:-
brainly.com/question/28321133
#SPJ4
Answer:
because the bad things have been pushed under the rug and the so called good things are more focused on.
Explanation:
Each of these pools enables the individual "to solve problems, or to create products, that are valued within one or more cultural settings (Gardner, 1983/2003)." ... The seven intelligences proposed by Gardner are linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, musical, interpersonal and intrapersonal.
Answer:
The outcome of the Battle of Brooklyn was a victory for the British, who killed or captured 1,000 Americans and proceeded to occupy Brooklyn and Manhattan for seven years. However, the British failed to capture Washington and his army, which withdrew across the East River to fight again and, eventually, win the war.