Behavior therapies often use ''counter conditioning'' techniques such as systematic desensitization and aversive conditioning to encourage clients to produce new responses to old stimuli.
The term "counterconditioning" refers to both a method and a potential mechanism by which behavior is altered through a fresh association with a stimulus with a diametrically opposed valence.
Systematic desensitization is the sort of counterconditioning most frequently used for therapeutic purposes. It is meant to lessen or get rid of a person's dread of a certain thing, circumstance, or activity. For instance, a dog who rushes at the window in response to a delivery person passing by is expressing fear or anxiety.
To learn more about counterconditioning here
brainly.com/question/15899749
#SPJ4
The difference in both Historian point of perspective was that Historian A believed the American Revolution was causes by colonist greed. Historian B believed the American Revolution was caused by the unfair taxe policies in the colonies.
Answer:
B). Its results are not generally applicable.
Explanation:
A case study is described as the research plan or an experimental investigation that primarily intends to observe or examine a phenomenon, individual, or a group(as representatives) within its authentic context to make generalized deductions or conclusions.
As per the question, option B best describes the outcomes of a case study. The description of 'its results are not generally applicable' reflects that the research could not lead to producing a generalized conclusion that can represent the other associated units intensively. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
