Because the american colonies were home to diverse religious and ethnic groups,

Social Studies

1 answer:

Sliva [168]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

b. social distinctions were more blurred than in europe.

Explanation:

British taxes practically caused the revolution of the colonies, therefore option "A" is not the correct answer.

That various religious and ethnic groups coexisted in the American colonies was no reason for colonists to tend to support British royalty (D). In fact, diversity and immigration were one of the reasons why the thirteen colonies flourished so quickly.

The colonists didn´t feel that British royalty did anything for them as they had to survive on their own, dedicating themselves mainly to agriculture. The difference in wealth between the inhabitants of England and the colonists was very large, therefore the colonists did not feel entitled to the rights of English citizens (C). Not because the American colonies had a great diversity of religious and ethnic groups.

Because the American colonies were home to diverse religious and ethnic groups, social distinctions were more blurred than in Europe (B). In New England, diversity was ironically the point in common that its inhabitants had and that would lead them to fight for their independence.

You might be interested in

Over the last few decades, it has become clear that some see the practice of spanking children to be an instance of disciplining

oee [108]

The correct answer is letter D

Explanation: The development of a compromise between the views.

8 0

4 years ago

Carrying capacity limits population growth in situations where population growth is __________.

Arte-miy333 [17]

K- selection is the term that describes when the population growth has already its carrying capacity limits. In addition, the process would be in favour to the population subjects who are more successful when competing fro resources compared to other organisms.

5 0

3 years ago

In 1960, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia joined Venezuela to form the

AfilCa [17]

Answer:

By controlling supplies, OPEC nations were able to set the prices for oil.

Explanation:

OPEC which is an acronym of Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries was established in1960 by Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Venezuela and has been increased to fifteen countries presently through the controlling of supplies.

OPEC nations were able to set oil prices to have control over the demands and supplies. This helps the OPEC members, with the belief that controlling oil supplies leads to equal aggregate demands and supply thereby leaving no surplus of oil.

Hence, the collaboration generates more money for the members of OPEC

3 0

3 years ago

A(n) ________ is a lawyer who is appointed by a judge to represent an individual who can't afford legal representation.

makkiz [27]

Your answer would be President.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why did the United States invade Iraq in 2003?

VARVARA [1.3K]

Answer:

The United States believed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction which posed a great threat at the hands of the dictatorial leader Saddam Hussein. It also believed that terrorists were supported and even harbored by the country. So, to remove the dictator from power and to get rid of any weapons and eliminate or drive out terrorists were the main objectives behind the attack on Iraq.

Explanation:

The rationale behind the motive to invade and attack Iraq was to primarily end the regime of the dictatorial leader Saddam Hussein. Other purposes were to end the harboring of terrorists in the land and eliminate any weapons of mass destruction that Iraq was believed to be in possession of.

The attack on Iraq by the United States in 2003 was based on US's beliefs that the Arab nation has disobeyed the demands of the United Nations and had harbored and supported terrorists. Moreover, the need to eliminate the dictator Saddam Hussein and establish a democratic government and provide peace to the Iraq people also became the main objective behind the invasion. The US also believed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction which can act as a huge threat to the overall safety of everyone around the world. So, the need to identify, isolate and destroy such weapons before they are actually put into use also led to the attack. US military continued to stay in Iraq till 2011 after which all troops were withdrawn.

5 0

4 years ago