Answer:
The new portfolio beta is 1.31 rounded off to two decimal places.
Explanation:
The portfolio beta is a function of the sum of the weighted average betas of the individual stock's that form up the portfolio. The portfolio beta is calculated using the following formula,
Portfolio beta = wA * Beta of A + wB * Beta of B + ... + wN * Beta of N
Where,
- w is the weightage of each stock in the portfolio
The beta of the portfolio when one stock with a beta of 1 is sold is,
The sum of individual stock betas for 19 stocks is = 20 * 1.31 - 1 * 1 = 25.2
The new portfolio beta when one stock with a beta of 0.97 is added is,
Portfolio beta = (25.2 + 0.97) / 20
Portfolio beta = 1.3085 rounded off to 1.31
Answer:
A) to determine the cost of the asset being depreciated we must use the first year's depreciation using the double declining method to find 40% of the asset's value:
40% of the asset's value = $29,200
asset's value = $29,200 / 40% = $73,000
B) salvage value = asset's value - total depreciation = $73,000 - $65,700 = $7,300
Answer:
Accountants tend to specialize in one of these fields, which leads to the different career tracks noted below:
Financial accounting. ...
Public accounting. ...
Government accounting. ...
Forensic accounting. ...
Management accounting. ...
Tax accounting. ...
Internal auditing.
hope my ans helps
please give brainliest to my answer
be sure to follow me
stay safe
have a good day
Solution:
The reserve ratio is 10%.
Money multiplier = 
= 
= 10.
So, the money multiplier increases by 10.
Money supply = amount x money multiplier = 1,000 x 10 = 10000
Therefore, because any certain items are equivalent, the rise in the currency supply is 10000 dollars.
When the FED sells 1,000 million worth of debt, this would further increase the monetary market, as the investments are fresh funds and the income from the bank is now used in the money supply.
Answer:
The court concluded truthfully, as he had done all the analysis and acknowledged the documentation and investment purposes.
The program scammed funds which might have been used for small-income housing by the government agency.
<em>United States v. McGuire, 744 F.2d 1197 (Cir. 11, 1984).</em>
