A parliamentary procedure has so many rules so as to carry out its main goal of reaching the best decision without bias.
If motions are brought up and are directly recognized without rules, do you think everything will be deliberated properly?
The organization strictly follow parliamentary procedure in order to reach a group decision with the least conflict. Therefore, everything can be narrowed down to "peace and order".
It's all for peace and order.
Answer:
Don't you use Hamon's for swordsmithing? Katana Hamon or something?
Explanation:
Mrs. Louis could ask Mr.Hollembeak for <em>further details about his findings and report.</em>
The discussion <em>aims to get the thruth</em> about a possible leak of information by not properly encrypted files. Mr. Hollembeak defends himself stating that concerning his knowledge and responsabilities he is innocent of any negligence for his department's security protocol was up to date.
If Mrs. Louis wants to be an effective participant in the discussion she could ask Mr.Hollembeak further details about his findings and report in order to discover any contradictions in his statement and then feel free to move to another topic.
