1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Olegator [25]
3 years ago
11

Why do you think the authors of the Fourth Amendment required law enforcement officers to establish probable cause before making

a search or arrest without a warrant?
Law
1 answer:
castortr0y [4]3 years ago
4 0

<u>Fourth Amendment Law Enforcement explained below: </u>

  • The Fourth Amendment permits the right to be free from non-reasonable searches by the government.
  • The government should complete an analysis of the commitment of crime that had taken place before the search warrant to be given.
  • They also have permission to search the area whether the area has done any illegal things.
  • The government is much more careful in protecting the law right to liberty and they are so consciousness in not disturbing the normal people.
You might be interested in
Which factor is a common link between routine activity theory and life course theory?
Artemon [7]
B. Structured,routine life
5 0
3 years ago
What are the exponents of [a], [b], and [c] (in that order) in the rate law?.
dimulka [17.4K]

Answer:

k = rate constant

A & B = reactants

x & y = reactant orders

Given reaction:          aA + bB + C → dD + eE

Rate Law:                  Rate = k[A]q[B]r[C]s

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Needs of victims after they been labor trafficked
Firlakuza [10]

Answer:

time and therapy

Explanation:

common sense

4 0
3 years ago
The doctrine of contributory negligence is followed in most states is called
xeze [42]

Answer:

The doctrine of contributory negligence is followed in most states is false.

Explanation:

Contributory negligence is a doctrine of common law that if a person was injured in part due to his/her own negligence, that is his/her negligence contributed to the accident, the injured party would not be entitled to collect any damages (money) from another party who supposedly caused the accident.

And historically, contributory negligence was the rule in all states, leading to harsh results. Many states now developed and adopted comparative negligence laws. Today, the jurisdictions that still use contributory negligence are few.

5 0
3 years ago
It’s a U.S government and politics question and I need help.
Stolb23 [73]

The answer is C              

I took the test

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • There was a thunderstorm in your area and the power went out.
    15·2 answers
  • This was a law created in 1887 to regulate railroads to ensure fair rates
    6·1 answer
  • What is not a safe skill you can employ to prevent your fellow teen passengers from distracting you while driving,answer option
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following must be a feature of an activity for it to be a game
    5·1 answer
  • Who are three members on groups that form the local government​
    12·1 answer
  • How do corporations engage EPA when they are putting laws into regulations
    5·1 answer
  • can someone please help me everyone ignored this one question i had!! it was do you agree or disagree that scientific theories a
    9·2 answers
  • "prison is too expensive and doesn't work , present a case for and against this statement "
    11·1 answer
  • Not having traffic laws enforced and in place would result in
    13·1 answer
  • Does OSHA provide employees with insurance?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!