Media plays an important role in protecting and promoting human rights in the world.
<h3>What is human rights violation?</h3>
A human rights violation refers to the disallowance of the freedom of thought and movement to which all humans legally have a right.
Media can make people aware of the need to promote certain values in the cause of human rights which are of eternal value to mankind.
Media can make people aware of their rights, expose their violations and focus attention on people and areas in need of the protection of human rights and pursue their cases till they achieve them.
Learn more about human rights violations here:
brainly.com/question/23566079
#SPJ1
Answer:
Legal and Illegal Interview Questions:
Legal:
How many times a month were you late for work at your last job?
Did you graduate from high school?
Illegal:
Do you have any mental illnesses?
What year did you graduate from high school?
Explanation:
Employers of labor should be aware of some interview questions, which are deemed legal, and some others that may be deemed illegal to ask job candidates. For this reason, employers should be careful to ensure they play by the rules. The illegal questions are considered so because they tend to exacerbate discrimination. Examples of interview questions that are deemed illegal are questions relating to age. Others include questions about marital status and parental status. Some other illegal questions relate to citizenship status, mental illness status, religious affiliations, and race or skin color.
Answer: most likely Procedural Due Process
Explanation:
and if they dong evidence that he stole u can also file for false accusation which can be used when a claim or allegation of wrongdoing that is untrue and/or otherwise unsupported by facts.
Judicial restraint is the political theory that says courts shouldn't, unless absolutely required, issue rulings that broaden or alter the character of existing laws.
<h3>Justiciable constraint is exercised by whom?</h3>
A jurist (judge or justice) who upholds a philosophy of restraint can be described as one who considers democracy to have intrinsic, rather than just instrumental, value, that the judiciary is indeed the least powerful of the three branches of government, and who values stability and predictability in the lawmaking process.
<h3>Why do advocates of judicial restraint assert that judges are impervious to public sentiment?</h3>
They are freed from the strain of the outer world of public opinion since they do not have to worry about being reelected. In the end, the majority may not always be correct. The fact that the Founders established appointed judges and elected legislators is not by coincidence.
Learn more about Judicial restraint: brainly.com/question/29545866
#SPJ4
Answer:
Pearson v. Callahan
Explanation:
This was a case that was decided by the United States which would deal with the doctrine of qualified immunity.
Hope this Helps!
