The answer is:
Audiences perspective of the story.
Option D is the correct answer to the question
Mastering has experiments and always getting them right
Answer:
In no way was the idea of "separate but equal" consistent with the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment, which basically establishes equal rights between African Americans and whites in the country, and admits the citizenship of black people.
The racist governments in the south of the country sought a mechanism to, without manifestly contravening this amendment, segregate the African American population and separate it from the white population. To do this, they sought to comply with the rights established in the Constitution, but through different services from those of whites, and of much lower quality.
Thus, with the complicity of the judicial systems, they violated the principle of equality of the Constitution, protecting themselves in an alleged legality of the "separate but equal" system.
Inductive reasoning is used to draw conclusions and is the opposite of deductive reasoning.
<h3>What is Inductive Reasoning?</h3>
This refers to the method that makes use of the specific details to the general ones in order to draw a conclusion.
Hence, we can see that your question is incomplete because you did not include the text, so a general overview was given to you to help you better understand the concept.
Read more about inductive reasoning here:
brainly.com/question/860494
#SPJ1
