1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Illusion [34]
3 years ago
8

Which of the following answers is an idea not expressed in the pamphlet Common Sense?

History
1 answer:
Sedaia [141]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer would be A. The British monarch should be respected at all times by the colonists. I know because this is the only answer that is an idea not expressed in the pamphlet Common Sense, and I also had this question on a test that I had; Also could you please mark me brainliest.

You might be interested in
What is the relationship between the pilgrims and the native Americans
kow [346]

The native inhabitants of the region around Plymouth Colony were the various tribes of the Wampanoag people, who had lived there for some 10,000 years before the Europeans arrived. Soon after the Pilgrims built their settlement, they came into contact with Tisquantum, or Squanto, an English-speaking Native American.

6 0
3 years ago
Why did the British act alone during king Leopolds rule
Julli [10]

Answer:

Mark as brainliest

Explanation:

symbolic presence in international legal accounts of the 19th century, but for historians of the era its importance has often been doubted. This article seeks to re-interpret the place of the Berlin General Act in late 19th-century history, suggesting that the divergence of views has arisen largely as a consequence of an inattentiveness to the place of systemic logics in legal regimes of this kind.

Issue Section:

 Articles

INTRODUCTION

The Berlin West Africa Conference of 1884-1885 has assumed a canonical place in historical accounts of late 19th-century imperialism 1 and this is no less true of the accounts provided by legal scholars seeking to trace the colonial origins of contemporary international law. 2 The overt purpose of the Conference was to ‘manage’ the ongoing process of colonisation in Africa (the ‘Scramble’ as it was dubbed by a Times columnist) so as to avoid the outbreak of armed conflict between rival colonial powers. Its outcome was the conclusion of a General Act 3 ratified by all major colonial powers including the US. 4 Among other things, the General Act set out the conditions under which territory might be acquired on the coast of Africa; it internationalised two rivers (the Congo and the Niger); it orchestrated a new campaign to abolish the overland trade in slaves; and it declared as ‘neutral’ a vast swathe of Central Africa delimited as the ‘conventional basin of the Congo’. A side event was the recognition given to King Leopold’s fledgling Congo Free State that had somewhat mysteriously emerged out of the scientific and philanthropic activities of the Association internationale du Congo . 5

If for lawyers and historians the facts of the Conference are taken as a common starting point, this has not prevented widely divergent interpretations of its significance from emerging. On one side, one may find an array of international lawyers, from John Westlake 6 in the 19th century to Tony Anghie 7 in the 21 st century, affirming the importance of the Conference and its General Act for having created a legal and political framework for the subsequent partition of Africa. 8 For Anghie, Berlin ‘transformed Africa into a conceptual terra nullius ’, silencing native resistance through the subordination of their claims to sovereignty, and providing, in the process, an effective ideology of colonial rule. It was a conference, he argues, ‘which determined in important ways the future of the continent and which continues to have a profound influence on the politics of contemporary Africa’. 9

5 0
3 years ago
True or false Pontiac and his forces helped the British defeat the French at Fort Detroit. ​
Fofino [41]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare and contrast the views of loyalists and patriots on American independence from Great Britain. 3 paragraphs please I have
crimeas [40]

Answer:

picture? i think u need a picture of it

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Critics of Hamilton's proposal for protective tariffs argued that ______.
Yanka [14]
- the government should support widespread land ownership, not industrial development

- they amounted to other regions subsidizing the New England economy
4 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • The growth of European cities around the year 1000 was caused by
    14·2 answers
  • The population trend from 1350 to 1450 is most likely the result of the...?
    10·1 answer
  • 7. What happened after to the African slaves after the auction?
    7·1 answer
  • In what way does the judicial branch check the powers of the executive branch?
    14·1 answer
  • Who was the first inventor?
    8·1 answer
  • 3. Why do you think Korean tribes created federations during Chinese colonization?
    15·2 answers
  • Select all the correct answers.
    5·2 answers
  • BEST ANSWER GETS BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • Us.history Help my plis
    15·1 answer
  • I need help plz I have tried so many times and can’t get it
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!