Answer:
Raymond's mistake was on the last step, since he didn't square root both sides
The correct answer should be

Step-by-step explanation:

Good luck!
<span>Actually the above equation can be solved by following the below steps to fins the value of x
Step1: 3(x-k)/w=4
Step 2: (3x-3k)/w=4
Step 3: (3x-3k)=4w
Step 4: 3x=4w+3k
So hence therefore by following the above steps we can conclude that the value of x is
Step 5: x=(4w+3k)/3</span>
Answer:

Since the angle between the two vectors is not 180 or 0 degrees we can conclude that are not parallel
And the anfle is approximately 
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case first we need to calculate the dot product of the vectors, and after this if the dot product is not equal to 0 we can calculate the angle between the two vectors in order to see if there are parallel or not.
a=[1,2,-2], b=[4,0,-3,]
The dot product on this case is:

Since the dot product is not equal to zero then the two vectors are not orthogonal.
Now we can calculate the magnitude of each vector like this:


And finally we can calculate the angle between the vectors like this:

And the angle is given by:

If we replace we got:

Since the angle between the two vectors is not 180 or 0 degrees we can conclude that are not parallel
And the anfle is approximately 
Answer:
2/3
Explanation:
Given the below;

We can see from the above that 9 is divisible by 3 and that 14 is divisible by 7, let's go ahead and reduce to the lowest term as shown below;