True. Most slave owning states had a vested interest in continuing slavery while others simply did not.
Explanation:
States like Massachusetts and Rhode Island were either industrialized or relied on thing other than farming for sustenance.
<u>As slaves were not employed in these parts it was easier for people there to campaign against slavery. </u>
<u>Down south, the white farmers relied on slaves for unpaid labor </u>and feared that they will lose massive amount of money and workforce if slavery was outlawed.
So vested interests did play a huge role in advocacy.
Both political parties and interest groups are formally organized.
interest groups are an organization of people who share a common interest and work together to protect/ promote that interest by influencing the government.
Interest groups very greatly in size, aims, and tactics. And as far as political parties use campaign finance committees to raise funds for election purposes.
It's false since a recession is a period of time when the GDP begins to FALL, which in turn means productions are slowed and workers can be laid off. My apologies if I didn't explain the best, But I believe it's false. Sorry if not.
<u>Three policies that helped sustain economic prosperity in the U.S. after WWI:</u>
Three policies were;
- Isolationism
- War loans interest
- Production of war material earned a lot of money
The world war 1 which started in 1914 and ended in 1919 also had the United States involved in the war. Even though it had drastic impact on the economies of the European countries, it did not have much effect on the economy of the United States because of some of it's major policies where the most important policy was that of isolationism where the United States did not enter in trade with any of the outside countries. The loans it had given to the Great Britain also helped it to get interest and money.
Because, The federal government did not enforce the Fugitive Slave Law of 1793
