<span>Seek out others' points of view and perspectives</span>
Answer:
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
Explanation:
We know that
Current ratio = Total Current assets ÷ total current liabilities
1.5 = $3,000,000 ÷ total current liabilities
So, the total current liabilities would be
= $2,000,000
And
Quick ratio = Quick assets ÷ total current liabilities
1.0 = Quick assets ÷ $2,000,000
Quick assets = $2,000,000
So, the inventory would be
= Total current assets - quick assets
= $3,000,000 - $2,000,000
= $1,000,0000
The answer is The income effect.
Income effect is described as the change in demand of a service or good brought on by change in the income of a consumer.It is observed in two cases first is when income of person increases and second is when price of goods or service decreases.
The scenario given in the question is an example of second case as the price of burger was less than normal Steve perceived his income to be able to buy more product in same price
The form of customer communication here is what is referred to as delivery status.
Given the FedEx tracking number that Alton has received, he would be able to get a customized and an in-depth tracking of the NFL jersey that he has ordered for his son.
The availability of a tracking number would also help to build his faith and confidence in the delivery service. This is because it is going to give him a timeline of his good that would help him to anticipate the delivery.
Read more on brainly.com/question/7146441?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Who is the franchisor? McDonald's
Who is the franchisee? C.B. Management Inc.
In a franchise relationship, the <u>franchisee</u> is economically dependent on the <u>franchisor's</u> business system.
The franchise relationship is defined by the <u>contract</u>.
Did C.B. Management, Inc.’s failure to make a payment due more than thirty days earlier constitute a breach of the franchise contract? YES
Why? A) the contract provided McDonald's could terminate the contract when a payment was more than 30 days late.
Did the contract provide that the acceptance of a late payment waived McDonald's right to terminate for late payments? NO
What does an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing require? That the parties act <u>reasonably</u>.
Did McDonald's act of accepting late payments in the past transform McDonald's right to terminate into a discretionary decision governed by the standard of good faith and fair dealing in the future? NO
Why? Which one of these reasons is not correct? B) the actions of the parties control this issue.
A court would likely find for <u>McDonald’s</u>
