Answer:
I think the answer (-2, 6)
Answer:
the answer is the first one, Cara multiplied only 4 and 7 together and did not multiply 4 and 13
Step-by-step explanation:
if you look through the question you can see that Cara evaluated the (-4)^2 correctly because a negative multiplied by a negative gives you a positive thus (-4)*(-4)= 16, then next you can see that Cara subtracted 2 from 6 correctly because (6-2)= (4), and last but not least Cara did multiply 2 by 4 correctly because 2*4 or 2(4) =8 so as you can see the answer is the first one
Answer:
The two triangles are related by Side-Side-Side (SSS), so the triangles can be proven congruent.
Step-by-step explanation:
There are no angles that can be shown to be congruent to one another, so this eliminates all answer choices with angles (SSA, SAS, ASA, AAA, AAS).
This leaves you with either the HL (Hypotenuse-Leg) Theorem or SSS (Side-Side-Side) Theorem. We could claim that the triangles can be proven congruent by HL, however, we aren't exactly sure as to whether or not the triangles have a right angle. There is no indicator, and in this case, we cannot assume so.
This leaves you with the SSS Theorem.
$3,062 for 1,000 gallons
3062 ÷ 1000 = <span>3.062
Unit rate:- $3.062 per gallon</span>
